\ /^%.\ /^%\ /f^\ /'^ ^iS '^ :^_^"=^^ V^p^c^ V^^^<^„ '<9;^^^<^ ..O^ ^*i. v<^ \7 .^-^ ^^, .# /"villi! ^ -0^^. %- V'-T^>> il ffsfm ^ <^ ^r 'v^ %^^ rl ^ ^ .O^ W. '«, ^ ^ 1^ o^ % t\^ ^o. Ml -* ^ ^ '^rf> A^ -^a ^0 v- %^^y4 ;^-,. vV .^" \ >* 4-. >, A .<^ ■s. ^yy^. THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. ZOOLOGY-VOL XXM. in'7 REPORT ON THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER DURING THE YEARS i87 3-7 6 UNDER THE COMMAND OF Captain GEORGE S. NARES, R.N., F.R.S. AND THE LATE Captain FRANK TOURLE THOMSON, R.N. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERINTENDENCE OF THE LATE Sir C. WYVILLE THOMSON, Knt, F.R.S., &c. REGIUS PROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EnlNBURfiH DIRECTOR OF THE CIVILIAN SCIENTIFIC STAFF ON BOARD AND NOW OF JOHN MURRAY ONE OF THE NATURALISTS OF THE EXPEDITION Zoology— Vol. XXII. r Publtsl)eti bp <0iDer of l^er Jflajestp's (Sobernmeut PRINTED FOR HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE AND SOLD V.Y LONDON :— EYRE & SPOTTISWOODE, EAST HARDING STREET, FETTER LANE EDINBURGH ;— ADAM & CHARLES BLACK DUBLIN :— HODGES, FIGGIS, & CO. 1887 -^2 Price Fifty Shillings. ^ APR 2 2 ^987 PRINTED BY NEILL AND COMPANY, EDINBURGH, FOR HER majesty's STATIONERY OFFICE. CONTENTS. Report on. the Deep-Sea Fishes collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. By Albert Gunther, M.A., M.D., Ph.D., F.R.S., Keeper of the • • * Department of Zoology in the British Museum. EDITOEIAL NOTE. The Report on the Deep-Sea Fishes, by Dr. Albert Giinther, F.R.S., occupies the whole of the present Volume. This Report, which forms Part LVII. of the Zoological Series of Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition, extends to nearly 400 pages, with 73 Lithographic Plates and several woodcuts. The Report comprises two Appendices, the first by Professor H. N. Moseley, F.R.S., on the structure of the Peculiar Organs on the Head of Ipnops, the second by R. von Lendenfeld, Ph.D., on the structure of the Phosphorescent Organs op Fishes. With reference to the depths at which the specimens of Deep-Sea fish were captured I desire to repeat here a statement so frequently made in connection with these publications. During the cruise the naturalists recorded in each case, as faithfully as possible, the depth to which the dredge or trawl was sent down. The animals may have been captured at the bottom, or in any of the intermediate layers between surface and bottom ; in many cases the structure, colour, or modifications of organs, and the contents of the stomach, furnish clear indications as to whether the animal lived at the bottom or on the surface, and on such matters the specialists in each group are the best judges. In this Report, therefore, the depths given for the specimens show that Dr. Giinther regards the specimens, with a few exceptions which are mentioned in the body of his Report, as having been captured at the recorded depth. This exceedingly valuable and comprehensive Report does not refer to viii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. the immature and larval specimens or pelagic fish captured at the surface of the sea during the Expedition. It is hoped that Dr. Giinther may prepare a short Report on these forms during the coming year. The Manuscript was received by me in instalments between the 9th September 1886 and the 28th June 1887. John Murray. Challenger Office, 32 Queen Street, Edinburgh, \t;t Aw/ust 1887. THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. ZOOLOGY. REPORT on the Deep-Sea Fishes collected by H.M.S. Challenger daring the Years 1873-76. By Dr. Albert Gunthek, M.A., M.D., Ph.D., F.R.S., Keeper of the Department of Zoology in the British Museum. PEEFACE. Although the collection of Deep-Sea Fishes which was made by the naturalists of H.M.S. Challenger was entrusted to me for investigation nearly ten years ago, the preparation of this Eeport was delayed by the pressure of other engagements, especially an increase of official duties. Only during the last two years I was able to steadily apply myseK in my leisure hours to the work of re-examining the specimens and of preparing the present Report for press. This delay appeared to be the less a matter of regret as it was known that deep-sea explorations were being actively carried on by two Institutions of the United States of America, and by the Norwegian, Italian and French Governments. As these expetlitions had the great advantage of profiting by the experiences of the Challenger, and were likely to materially increase our knowledge of bathybial fishes, and to elucidate points which the Challenger with its initial apparatus had left obscure (such as the vertical range of pelagic forms), it seemed advantageous, in order to produce a complete account of the fish fauna of the deep sea, to await the publication of the results of those explorations. The hope, however, of utilizing those results for the present work became fainter, as in tlie succeeding years only more or less fragmentary and preliminary notices appeared, with one exception, viz., that of the valuable Report on the Fishes of the Norwegian North Atlantic Expedition. (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. — PAKT LVII. — 1887.) - ^ Lll ffl jj THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. One of the instructions given to me by the late Sir Wyville Thomson was, to include in my Report not only the species collected by the Challenger, but also those which from other sources are known to inhabit the deep sea. He agreed with me in the conclusion I arrived at from the materials then available, that a depth of 300 or 350 fathoms should be considered the boundary between the surface and deep-sea fishes, the fishes above that level belouffino- principally to littoral genera, whilst those specially organized for bathybial life appeared at or below that depth. Accordingly, almost all fishes captured by the Challenger at a less depth than 350 fathoms were included in my Report on the Shore Fishes. However, the subsequent Norwegian and North American explorations brought to liwht instances of fishes with an unmistakably bathybial organisation occurring at a much shallower depth than the forms discovered by the Challenger, or, on the other hand, showed that certain littoral forms descend not only to 100, but even to beyond 300 fathoms. It consequently seemed advisable to abandon the intention of limiting this Report to fishes occurring below 300 fathoms, and to adopt instead the 100-fathom line as the boundary at which, with the extinction of sun-light, the bathybial fauna commences, sporadically at first and largely mixed with surface forms. This line does not express a sharply defined boundary any more than any other depth, but it is chosen for the purposes of the present Report, in which a certain upper limit of the deep-sea fauna had to be fixed. In employing it I intend only to express the fact, that no fish not known at present to have occurred beyond the 100-fathom line, is admitted in the present Report ; and, furtlier, that no truly bathybial fish is known to live habitually above that line. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PKEFACE, . . IISrTRODUCTIOi^, History of our Knowledge of the Fish-Fauna of the Deep Sea, Characteristics of Deep-Sea Fishes, ...... Vertical and Horizontal Distribution of Deep-Sea Fishes, .... The Constitution of the Fish-Fauna of the Deep Sea, .... Table showing the Vertical Eange of Distribution of Species, Genera, and Families, DESCEIPTION OF GENERA AND SPECIES. Chondropterygii. Plagiosto.mata. Selachoidea — Sharks, ....... Scylliidte. Scyllium, M. and H. canescens, Gthr., ....... Pristiurus, Bonap. melanostomus, Raf., . . ... Notidanidae. Chlamydoselache, Garman. anguinea, Garman, Spiuacidje. Spinax, M. and H. spiiiax, L. granulosus, Gthr., Centropliorus, M. and H. foliaceus, Gthr., . coilolepi^, Booage, squamulosus, Gthr., Gentroscyllium, !M. and H. fabricii, Enhidt., granulatum, Gthr., Lxmargus, M. and H. horealu, Scoresby, Batoidea — Rays. Raja, Cuv. isotrachys, Gthr., circularis, Couch, PLATE PIG PAGE i xix xxiv xxxiii XXX vii xl A 1 2 f LXIV. ... 1 ] LXV. ... J II. A B 4 4 5 5 5 6 7 ui. IV THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Batoidea — Rays — continued. Raja radiata, Donov., liyperhorea, Collett, plutonia, Garman, batis, L., vomer. Fries, fulloniea, L., nidrosiensis, Collett, UrolopJius, M. and H. kaianus, Gtiir., . HOLOCEPHALA. Chitncera, L. monstrosa, L., affinis, Capello, . Acanthopterygii. Percida3. Anthias, Cuv. megalepis, Gthr., Centropristis, Cuv. Val. pleurospilus, Gthr., Scombrops, Schleg. chilodipteroides, BIkr., Acropoma, Schleg. philippinense, Gthr., Propoma, Gthr. roseiim, Gthr., Malaciclithys, Doderlein. griseus, Dod., Synagrops, Gthr. japonicus, Doderlein, Polyprion, Cuv. cernium, Val., Scorpajnidse. Scorpama, Gthr. percoides, Solander, dadyloptera, de la Eoche, huhlii, Bowd, Sebastes, Gthr. marinus, L., viviparus, Kroy., Ttmcrochir, Gthr., hexanema, Gthr., oadatus, Gthr., . Setarches, Johnson. fidjiensis, Gthr., . Bathysebastes, Steind. and Dtiderl. albescens, St. and D., Lioscorpius, Gthr. longiceps, Gthr., . PLATE FIG. PAGE 8 8 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 13 14 15 15 15 16 XX, 268 17 XX, 17 xix 17 18 18 18 18 19 20 20 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. Berycidsp. PLATE FIG. PAGE Hoplostethus, C. V. mediterranemn, C. V., * 21 Tradddithys, Shaw. australis, Shaw, .... . 22 jaclisoniensis, Macleay, ... 22 elongatus, Gthr., . . . . . V. c 22 fernandezianus, Gthr., . ... 23 traillii, Hutton, .... . LV. A 23 madeayi, Johnston, 24 intermedius, Hector, . V. B 24 darwinii, Johnson, ... 24 Anoplogaster, Gthr. cornutus, C. V., . 25 Caulolepis, Gill. longidens, Gill, .... . 26 Melamphaes, Gthr. microps, Gthr., .... 26 typhlops, Lowe, .... . V. A 27 megalopis, Ltkn., .... . V. B 27 crassiceps, Gthr., . . . VIII. B 28 mizolepis, Gthr., .... 28 robustus, Gthr., .... 29 heanii, Gthr., .... 29 suhorUtalis, Gill, , . ... 30 Malaeosarcus, Gthr. macrostoma, Gthr., ... 30 Stephanoheryx, Gill. monx, Gill, .... ... 31 Beryx, Cuv. decadactylus, C. V. . xix, 33 splendens, Lowe, .... xLx, 33 Polymixia, Lowe. nobilis, Lowe, .... . I. B 34 Poromiira, Goode and Bean. capita, G. and B., 35 Myripristis, Cuv. kaianus, Gthr., . . ... 35 Trichiuridae. Nealotus, Johnson. tripes, Johns., .... . 35 Aphanopiis, Lowe. carho, Lowe, .... . vu. A 36 Nesiarchus, Johnson. nasutus, Johns., .... .... 37 Lepidopus, Gouan. caudatus, Euphrasen, . 37 tenuis, Gthr., .... . vn. B 37 elongatus, Clarke, . 38 VI THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Trichiuridfe — continued. Triehiurus, L. lepturus, L. Euoxymetopon, Poey. txniatus, Poey, . poeyi, Gthr., Thyrsites, C. V. preiiosus, Cooco, . prometheus, C. V., Gempylus, Cuv. Val. serpens, C. V., . Carangidie. Anomalops, Kner. palpehratus, Boddsert, Cyttidae. Cyttus, Gthr. abhreviahis, Hector, Antigonia, Lowe. capros, Lowe, Diretmus, Johnson. argenteus, Johns., aureiLS, Campbell, Coryphsenidfe. Schedophilus, Cocco. medusophagus, Coeco, lockingtonii, Jordan and Gilbert, enigmatieus, Lockington, Trachinidse. Bathydraco, Gthr. antarticus, Gthr., Aphritis, C. V. gohio, Gthr., Acanthaphri/is, Gthr. grandisquainis, Gthr., Gliampsodon, Gthr. vorax, Gthr., Uranoscopus, L. Icaianus, Gthr., . Notothcnia, Rich. mir.ops, Gthr., Pediculati. Luphius, Art. pjiscatorius, L., naresii, Gthr., Himantolopjhus, Rhdt., groenlandicus, Rhdt., reinhardti, Ltk., . Aegxonichthijs, Clarke. appelii, Clarke, . PLATE XLIII. FIG. PAGE 39 39 39 xix, 268 XX, 268 41 41 42 44 45 45 XLIV. VIII. A 46 46 46 48 48 49 49 49 268 49 49 50 51 51 EEPOET ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. VU Pediculati — continued. PLATE FIG. PAGE Ceratias, Kroyer. hispiiiosus, Gthr., . XI. B .53 holhijlli, Kroy., . .53 uranoscopus, Murr., . XI. C .54 shufeldti. Gill, 54 canmculatus, Gthr.. . XI. D 55 Cnjptopsaras, Gill. couesii, Gill., 55 Oneirodes, Liitken. esclirichtii, Ltk., . 56 Melanocetus, Gthr. johnsonii, Gthr., . 56 murrayi, Gthr., . . XI. A 57 Linopliryne, Collett. lucifer, ColL, 57 Chaunax, Lowe. pidus, Lowe, . X. A 58 Halieutxa, C. V. sentieosa, Goods, . 59 D-ibranchus, Ptrs. atlanticus,^ Ptrs., 59 Cottidae. Cotfunculus, Collett. microps, Coll., . IX. A 60 thomsonii, Gthr., . IX. B 61 Cottus, Art. hathyhius, Gthr., . . X. C 62 Centridermichth ys, Richards. uncinatus, Ehdt., . 62 Icelus, Kriiy. hamafus, Kroy., . 63 Triglops, Reinhardt. pingelii, Rhdt., . . 63 Trigla, Art. leptacantlms, Gthr., 63 Lepidotriijla, Gthr. spiloptera, Gthr., • ■•■ 64 Cataphracti. Peristethus, Lacep. miniaium, Goode, 64 molueceme, Blkr., 64 murrayi, Gthr., . 65 liorhynchus, Gthr., 65 micrmieyna, Poey, 65 trmicafum, Gthr., . 65 Agonus, Bl. Schn. decagonus, BI., . ... 65 ' This fish was obtained at 360 fatlioiiis not at 3600 fathoms, as stated in the description. VIU THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Discoboli. Ci/clopferus, Art. spinosus, Miill., . Ldparis, Art. fabricii, Krdy., . mteroptis, Gthr., . ffelatinosm, Pall., . Paraliparis, Coll. bathyhius, Coll., . liparinus, Goode, memhranaceus, Gthr., Gobiidae. Callionymus, L. kaianus, Gthr., . calaurqpomus, Eich., BlenniidEe. Anarrhichas, Art. minor, Olafs, lafifrons, Stp., Blenniops, Nilss. ascanii, Walb., . Trachypteridae. Tracliypterus, Gouan, . Stylophorus, Shaw, Regalecus, Briinn., Lophotidas. Lophotes, Giorna. cepedianus, Giorna, cristahis, Johns., . Acanthopterygii Pharyngognathi. Hdiastes, C. V. roseus, Gthr., Anacanthini. Lycodidse. Lyeodes, Reinh. esmarMi, Coll., . reticulatus, Rhdt., frigidus, Coll., pallidus, Coll., seminudus, Bwk., mursena, Coll., sarsii, Coll., ven-illi, G. and B., paxillus, G. and B., paxilloides, G. and B., Lycodonus, Goode and Bean. mirahiUa, G. and B., Gymnelis, Reinh. viridis, Fabr., PLATE FIG. PAGE 66 XI. XII. XII. ... 66 B 66 ... 67 C 68 68 D 69 70 70 70 71 XIII. 71 72 73 73 76 76 76 77 77 79 79 79 79 80 80 81 81 81 EEPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. IX Lycodidse — continued. MelanosHgma, Gtlir. gelatinosum, Gthr., Gadidae. Gadus, Art. moirMia, L., minutus, L., poutassou, Eisso, argenteus, Guich., Mora, Risso. mediterranea, Risso, Halargyreus, Gtlir. johnsonii, Gthr., . Melanonus, Gthr. gracilis, Gthr., Mei-luccius, Cuv. vulgaris, Flem., . Hypdcometes, Goode. gohioides, Goode, . Lotella, Kaup. marginata, Gthr., Uraleptus, Costa. maraldi, Eisso, . Physicuhis, Kaup. dalioigkii, Kaup., Jcaupi, Poey, peregrinus, Gthr., Phycis, Cuv. hlennioides, Briinn., chesteri, G. and B., regius, Walb., americanus, Bl., . tenuis, Mitch., Lsemonema, Gthr. harhatidum, G. and B., Haloporphyrus, Gthr. guentheri, Gigl., . lepidion, Risso, . eques, Gthr., inomnee, Gthr., . ensiferus, Gthr., . Antimora, Gthr. rostrata, Gthr., viola, G. and B., . Salilota, Gthr. australis, Gthr., . Molva, Nilss. molva, L., ahyssorum, Nilss., (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. PART LVII. — 1887.) PL.^TE FIG. PAGE 82 XIV. XIV. XVII. 82 xix 82 83 83 83 84 85 86 86 XX, 87 88 88 88 89 89 89 89 89 90 XVIII. A 90 91 XVIII. B 91 XX. B 92 XIX. A 92 XVI. A 93 XV. 94 XVII. 95 96 9G LIl h THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Gadidae — continued. Onus, Eisso. macrophthahnns, Gthr., carpenteri, Gthr., reinJiardti, Coll., . septentrionalis, Coll., ends, Enh., cimbrius, L., Brosmms, Cuv. hrosme, Miill., Chiasmodus, Johns. nir/e); Johns., Ophidiidje. Baraihrodenms, G. and B. manatinus, G. and B., Neobytliites, Goode and Bean. grandis, Gthr., macrops, Gthr., . ocellatus, Gthr., . gillii, G. and B., . Cateehjx, Gthr. mesderi, Gthr., . Pteridium, Scopoli. atrum, Eisso, Pteroidonuf, Gthr. quinquarius, Gthr., Dicrolene, Goode and Bean. intronigra, G. and B., Mixonus, Gthr. laticeps, Gthr., Bathyonus, Gthr. compressus, Gthr., txnia, Gthr., catena, G. and B., Porogadus, G. and B. gracilis, Gthr., . miles, G. and B., . rostratus, Gthr., . Nemaionus, Gthr. 2)ectoralis, G. and B., Diplacanthopoma, Gthr. hrachysoma, Gthr., Acanthmius, Gthr. armatus, Gthr., . Typhlonus, Gthr. nasus, Gthr., Aphyonus, Gthr. gelatinosus, Gthr., RliodicMhys, CoUett. regina, Coll., PLATE FIG. PAGE 96 . XLII. D 97 . XIX. B 97 98 98 98 98 99 100 XXI. A 100 . XX. A 102 XXI. B lO.S 103 . XXIII. B 104 10.5 XXII. B 106 107 . XXV. B 108 . XXII. A 109 . XXIII. A 110 111 . XVI. B 112 113 . XXIV. B 113 114 . XXIII. C 115 XXIV. A 117 . XXV. A 119 XXVI. A 120 121 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XI Ophidiidse — continued. Ophidiuin, Cuv. mursmolepig, Gthr., Macruridae. Macrurus, Bl. ( CcBlurliynch us), parallelus, Gthr., . japonicus, Schleg., austrcdis, Rich., . ajelorhijnclius, Risso, camiinatus, Goode, fasciatus, Gthr., . {Macrurus). fabricii, Sundev., rudis, Gthr., nasutus, Gthr., serrulatus, Gthr.,. sclerorhijnclius, Vul., sequahs, Gthr., hairdii, G. and B., goodii, Gthr., holotracliys, Gthr., asper, Gthr., carinatus, Gthr., . ( Coryph senoides) . mjiestris, Gunn., . altipinnis, Gthr., . (Mystacojumis). lonfjiharhis, Gthr., italicus, Giglioli, . {lAonurus). Jiltcauda, Gthr., . rnicrolepis, Gthr., (Trachonunis). irillosus, Gthr., (Cetonurus). crassiceps, Gthr., . (ChaUnurus). leptulepis, Gthr., . dniulus, G. and B., fernandezianus, Gthr., liocephalus, Gthr., murrayi, Gthr., . (Optonurtis). denticulafus, Rich., (Malacocejihalus). Isevts, Lowe, macroehir, Gthr., sulcatus, G. and B., PLATE FIG. PAGE 268 XXIX. A 125 XXIX. C 127 127 xix ,128 L. B 129 xxvm. A 129 130 XXVII. 131 XXX. B 132 XXX. A 133 XXXII. A 133 XXXII. G 134 XXXII. B 135 136 xxvm. B 136 XXXVI. A 137 XXXUI. A 137 138 XXXIX. A 138 XVIII. C 139 140 XXXIV. B 141 142 XXX VI. XXXVII. 142 143 XXXI. 144 145 XXXVIII. B 145 xxx^^II. A 145 XXXIV. A 146 147 XXXIX. B 148 XXIX. B 148 149 xu THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Macruridse — continued. PLATE FIG. PAGK {Nematonurus). armatm. Hector, .... . XL. A 150 affinis, Gthr., .... . XL. B 151 longiJUis, Gtlir., .... . XXXV. 151 Trachyrhynclms, Giorna. iracliyrhytichus, Eisso, . XLI. Cxix,152 longirostris, Gtbr., . XLI. B 153 mmrayi, Gthr., .... . XLI. A 153 Batliygadus, Gthr. cottoides, Gthr., .... . XLII. A 154 multijilis, Gthr., .... . XLII. B 155 cavei-nostis, G. and B., . 156 macrops, G. and B., . ... 156 lotKjifilis, G. and B., . 157 Macrworms, Gthr. novx-zelandiss, Hector, . ... 157 Lyconidse. Lyconus, Gthr. pinnatus, Gthr., .... . XLII. C 15S Ateleopodidse. Ateleojjus, Schleg. japonicus, Blkr., . PleuronectidcT. Hippoglossiis, Cuv. piiiguis, Fabr., Hippoglossoides, Gottsche. platessoideg, Fabr., Pcecilopsetta, Gthr. colorata, Gthr., . AnticithariLs, Gthr. p)olyifpiJus, Gthr., Samaris, Gray. inaculatus, Gthr., Lepidopisetta, Gthr. maculata, Gthr., . Pseudorhombus, Blkr. hedoris, Gthr., boojis, Hector, oMongus, Mitch., . ocellatus, Gthr., . Rhomboidich thys, Blkr. cornutus, Gthr., . Moiwlene, Goode. sessilicauda, Goode. Citharich thys, Blkr. areti/rom, Goode, unicornis, Goode, 159 161 161 162 162 162 162 163 164 164 164 165 165 165 166 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XUl Pleuronectidse — continued. Pleuronectes, Gthr. heanii, Goode, ajnoglossus, L., . Nemataps, Gthr. microstoma, Gthr., ' Solea, Gthr. Icaiana, Gthr., Aphoristia, Kaup. nebulosa, G. and B., Physostomi. Sternoptychidse. Arr/i/ropelecus, Cocco. hemigymniis, Cocco, olfeu'di, Cuv., Stei'uopitijx, Herm. diaphana, Herm., Polyi2mu8, Gthr. S2^!7ll>s1ls, Gthr., Gonostuma, Rafin. denudatum, Raf., eIo7i(jatum, Gthr., (jracile, Gthr., microdon, Gthr., . Photichthi/s, Hutton. argenteus, Hutton, Chauliodus, Bl. Schn. sloanii, Bl. Schn., Scopelidae. Saums, G. V. liaianu!<, Gthr., . Harpodon, Les. microchir, Gthr., . Bathijsaurus, Gthr. ferox, Gthr., mollis, Gthr., Batlujpterois, Gthr. longifilis, Gthr., . longijies, Gthr., . longicauda, Gthr., qtiadrifilis, Gthr., Ipnops, Gthr. muiTayi, Gthr., . Chloropldhalmus, Bonap. agaaifkii, Bonap., jvoductus, Gthr., . nigripinnis, Gthr., gracilis, Gthr., PLATE SLVII. FIG. PAGE 166 166 166 ... 167 ... 167 167 167 XLV. D 169 170 172 XLV. B 173 .\LV. C 174 175 XLV. A 178 179 180 180 XLVI. A 181 XLVI. B 18:5 XLVII. ^\ 185 XLVIII. Bf xLvin. A 188 XXVL V, 188 XXXIU. B 189 191 L. C 192 L. D 193 LI. A 193 XUX. A 194 XIV THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Scopelidce — continued. Scopelus, Gthr. macrolepidotus, Johns., glacialis, Eeinli., . antardicus, Gtlir., engraulis, Gthr., . dumerilii, Blkr., . NamiohracMurn, Gthr. nigrum, Gthr., Odontostonms, Cocco. lu/alinus, Cocco, . Omosudin, Gthr. lowii, Gthr., Plagijodus, Steller. ferox, Lowe, assculapius, Bean, altirelis, Poey, hm-ealis, Gill, StomiatidEe. AstronesiJies, Kich. niger, Rich., Stomias, Guv. boa, Risso, affinis, Gthr., ferox, Eeinh., Echiostoma, Lowe. harhatum, Lowe, . Oposfomias, Gthr. micripnus, Gthr., . Pacliystomias, Gthr. microdon, Gthr., . Photonectes, Gthr. alhipinnis, Doderl., Malacosteus, Ayres. nigei; Ayres, indicus, Gthr., Batlwpliihis, Giglioli. nigerrimus, Gigl., Idiacanthus, Ptrs. fascioJa, Ptrs., ferox, Gthr., Salmonidse. Argentina, Art. silus, Cuv., spliyrxna, L., liogJossa, C. V., . elongata, Hutton, Microstoma, Cuv. rotundatiim, Eisso, groenlandicum, Knhrdt., PLATE FIG. PAGE 196 196 LI. D 196 LI. C 197 198 LII. B 199 LII. A 200 HI. C 201 203 203 203 203 LII. 203 204 LIV. A 205 205 LIII. B 206 LIII. A 208 LXII. C 210 212 LIV. C 214 LIV. B 214 215 215 D 216 217 217 217 217 219 ... 219 KEPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XV Salmonidse — continued. Bathijlagug, Gthr. atlanticus, Gthr., . aniarticus, Gthr., . Bathythrissidas. Batltythrissa, Gihi. dorsalis, Gtkr., Alepocephalida3. Alepocephalus, Risso. rosiratus, Risso, . agasdzii, G. and B., productus. Gill, . bairdii, G. and B., niger, Gthr., Bathytrodes, Gthr. inacrolepis, Gthr., mirrolejns, Gthr., rostratus, Gthr., . Platytrodes, Gthr. apus, Gthr., Xenodermidithys, Gthr. nodulosvs, Gthr., . Halosauridfe. Halosaurus, Johns. otoenii, Johns., niaerodiir, Gthr., mediorostris, Gthr., rostratus, Gthr., . affinis, Gthr., Notacanthi. Notacantlius, Bloch. {Notaca7ithus). sexspinis, Rich., . nasus, BL, phasganorus, Goode, honapaHii, Risso, {Polyacantlionotus). rissoamus, FU. and Ver., . MurajnidtB. Anguillina. Congromurxna, Kaup. guttulaia, Gthr., . SimendieJys, Goode and Bean. parasiticus, G. and B., Mursenesocina. Nettastoma, Raf. meJanurum, Raf., parciceps, Gthr., . procerum, Goodo and B., PLATE ( LX. 1 LXI. LI. FIG. PAGE ... 219 ... 220 222 xix, 223 223 223 224 224 LVII. B 225 LVII. A 226 I;VIII. B 227 Lvin. A 229 LVIIl. C 230 236 LIX. A 237 LIX. C 239 LIX. D 240 LIX. B 240 B 243 9-15 ) A / ... 248 ... 249 C 249 Lxin. 250 252 252 253 253 253 XVI THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. LXII. LXII. LXIII. LXVI. LXIII. A B C Synapliobranchina. Synaphohranchus, Jolins. pinnatus, Gronov., . • ■ • hathyhius, Gthr., . . • • • iiifernalis, Gill, . . . • • hrevidorsalis, Gthr., . - • • Saecopharyiigina. Saccoptharynx, Mitchill. ampullaceus, Harwood, . . . • pelecanoides, Vaill., . . • • bairdii, Gill and Eyder, .... Nemiclithyina. NemicMliys, Rich. scolopacea. Rich., .... avocetta, Jord. and Gilb., infans, Gthr., . . . . ■ Cyema, Gthr. atrum, Gthr., ..... Plectognathi. Triacanthodes, Blkr. anomalus, Schleg., . . . • ■ .... Monacanihus, Cuv. fessellatus, Gthr., . . . . . .... Cyclostomata. Myxine, L. r/Iutinosa, L., . . . . • . .... atistralis, Jen., . . . . . . .... APPENDIX A., Report on the Structure of the Peculiar Organs in the Head of Ipnops. By Professor H. N. Moseley, F.R.S. APPENDIX B., Report on the Structure of the Phosphorescent Organs of Fishes. By R. von Lendenfeld, Ph.D., F.L.S. FIG. PAGE B D 253 •254 254 255 256 262 262 263 263 264 265 26G 267 267 267 269 577 INTRODUCTION. The materials which form the subject of this Report cousisted of 794 specimens, of which 610 were obtained during the voyage of the Challenger, 88 on the cruises of the "Knight Errant " and " Triton," and 96 from various other sources. These specimens are referred to 266 species, 177 falling to the share of the Challenger, and 14 being due to the exploration of the Fseroe Channel. The number of new forms discovered by the Challenger amounts to 144, whilst by the deep-sea exploration of the Fseroe Channel ten species were added to the fauna of the British Seas. The latter possess, perhaps, the greatest interest to the student of the British marine fauna; they verified the supposition which had been entertained for some time, viz., that fishes distinct from those of the littoral fauna inhabit the depths of the ocean surrounding the British Islands. At a time when so much attention is paid to the investigation of the marine products of the British Seas, it may be hoped that the hitherto intermittent efforts of exploring the deeper parts of this ocean may be prosecuted in as systematic a manner as the explorations carried on on the American side of the Atlantic, where the United States Government has spared no expense to secure the rich harvest that was to be expected not only for the advancement of knowledge, but also for the direct benefit to the country. The majority of the Challenger specimens were at least externally in a very good state of preservation ; those fishes only which possess bones, integuments, or fin-rays of a soft or delicate texture, and thin deciduous scales, naturally suffered more or less through being dragged to the surface from a depth of 1000 and more fathoms. Such specimens can reach the surface in perfect condition only under exceptional circumstances. However, with few exceptions, even the specimens of delicate structure were sufficiently well preserved to enable us to recognise their original shape and the arrangement of their scales, and to reproduce them in what are believed to be tolerably accurate figures. Unfortunately the abdominal organs were only too frequently found to be destroyed, or had suffered too much by laceration and decomposition to admit of examination. This was especially the case in those provided with an air-bladder, which was almost invariably torn into mere shreds. The stomach was nearly always empty. This condition of the specimens, combined with the circumstance that many of the new types were represented (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. PAET LVII. 1887.) Lll ''■ xviii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. only by one or two examples, which have to be kept intact for the use of future investi- gators, must account for the scanty information which I am able to give with regard to their internal structure. In some of the specimens the so-called phosphorescent organs were well enough preserved for microscopical examination, and having always held the opinion that the function of all these organs was to produce light, an opinion which has been partly or wholly opposed by Leuckart, Ussow and Leydig, I was particularly anxious that as much as possible of the materials of the Challenger should be utilized for a thorough histological investigation of these organs by zoologists thoroughly versed in the method of histological research. Mr. Murray acceded without hesitation to this proposal, and it was hoped that Professor Moseley would undertake the whole of this investigation ; but as he was compelled by other duties to limit himself to the examination of the remarkable organs in the genus Ipnops, the remainder were entrusted to Dr. von Lendenfeld. The reports of both these gentlemen will be found in the Appendices to the descriptive report. My technical descriptions of the Challenger fishes will be found to be much more concise than those given by some recent writers on similar subjects, and will appear to some to be too short. In my own experience, the practice of circumstantially describing every minute detail of the surface of a fish, repeating every jioint of structure common to all the species of the genus or famdy, and indiscriminately mixing individual features with specific, not only renders the use of these lengthy descriptions a laborious and thankless task, but actually leads to misunderstandings not less frequently than insufficient short diagnoses prepared by inexperienced describers. In fact, in several instances I have found that the descriptions which I published some ten years ago as " preliminary diagnoses," express so fully the specific characters of the fishes as to render any additions to them superfluous. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xix HISTORY OF OUE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FISH-FAUNA OF THE DEEP SEA. Isolated examples of Deep-Sea Fishes had fallen into the hands of zoologists at an early period of systematic ichthyology ; thus, specimens of Trachyi^terus, Regalecus, Saccopteryx, Stylojjhorus, Plagyodus, and other genera were known to and described by zoologists of the last century. But, having been captured whilst floating on the surface or near to the coast, they were regarded merely as extremely scarce creatures, without any clear idea being entertained that they were stray individuals from the unknowoi depths of the ocean. Risso was the first to distinguish a bathybial fish-fauna, assigning to it certain fishes and stating the depths at which they habitually live. In enumerating^ the various regions of the Gulf of Genoa he states — " Les grands abimes de la mer ne sent frequentes que par les alepocephales, les pomatomes, les chimeres et les lepidolepres. Les profondeurs moindres sont la demeure habituelle des merlans, des molves, des phycis, des soldados, des citules, des serioles, des tetragonures, des castagnolles, etc." He states exactly the depths inhabited by several fishes : thus Alepocephcdus rostratus occurs at a depth of 2000 feet or more (350 fathoms), Tracliyrhynchus trachyrhynchiis and Macrurus ccelorhynchus at a depth of 1500 or 1800 feet (250 or 300 fathoms) "ou parait constamment regner une temperature de dix degres," Uraleptus maraldi at a depth of 1000 feet (170 fathoms), and Gadiis minutus (Morua capelantis) at a depth of 300 metres (150 fathoms). During his numerous and prolonged visits to the Island of Madeira the Rev. R. T. LowE^ paid special attention to the wonderful variety of the fishes of the sea surrounding that island. He discovered a number of new forms, the bathybial habits of which were ascertained, either by himself at the time of their discovery, or subsequently by others who studied the subject after him. In his History of the Fishes of Madeira, the five parts of which appeared at irregular intervals between the years 1843 and 1860, and which unfortunately remained unfinished, he gives the precise depths at which several species occur, viz., Beryx splendens, "which begins to be met with, of small size, at a depth of 150 or 200 fathoms, but is scarcely ever taken in full size and abundance, except with its congener, Beryx decadactylus, the Alfonsin a caste larga, at the enormous depth of from 300 to 400 fathoms, and from one to two leagues from shore " ; Scorpgena kuhlii, the "Requeime," which is "caught with lines of from 100 to 250 fathoms"; Thyrsites ' Histoire naturelle des principales productions de I'Europe m<5ridionale, vol. 'iii., Paris, 1826 ; Introduction, page .X. 2 He left England with liis vdk in April 1874 for his last journey to Madeira, which he never reached again. The steamer " Liberia," in which he had taken his passage, foundered in the Bay of Biscay, not a soul being saved of the passengers and crew. To him and to his successor in the field of Madeiran ichthyology, Mr. J. Y. Johnson, I owe a debt of gratitude for the encouragement and help they gave me at an early period of my ichthyological studies. XX THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEE. pretiosus, the "Escolar," which "is taken with an ordinary bait at a depth (the fishermen affirm) of from twelve to fourteen linlias ( = 300-400 fathoms), living habitually near the bottom, in company with the Cherne (Polyprion cernium), Ccelho (Thyrsites prometheus or Prometheus atlanticus), etc."; Thyrsites pivmetheus, which "lives habitually at the bottom, and is taken at most seasons in a depth of from 100 to 300 or 400 fathoms"; Scorpsena dactyloptera, from 250 to 400 fathoms. Especially instructive is Lowe's account of the capture and occurrence of Polyprion cernium ; he says : — " The Sherny in Madeira is only captured by the hook ; and though shoals of small fishes, weighing from five to twenty pounds, and called Chernotta, are said to be often taken near the surface, in the neighbourhood of floating wreck or logs of wood, the proper habitat of the full-sized fish, weighing from thirty to one hundred pounds, is from one to two or three leagues from shore, and at the enormous depth of from twelve to fifteen or sixteen linhas, or from three hundred to four hundred fathoms. With a strong line^ of this length, to the bottom of which is tied a stone (called the ' pendula') of three or four pounds' weight, and having attached immediately above the stone, at intervals of eighteen inches, from twelve to fifteen strong hooks, baited with pieces of Cavallo [Mackerel] or Chicharro [Madeiran' Horse-Mackerel], I have been frequently assisting at their capture. Coming up from these enormous depths, the fish becomes so distended with gas, expanding upon the removal of the vast pressure below, that it rises to the surface, not indeed entirely dead, but wholly powerless, and in a sort of rigid cataleptic spasm ; the stomach is usually inverted, and protruded into the mouth ; and thu eyes in general are forced so completely from their sockets, sticking out often like two horns, that ' eyes like a Cherne ' is a common phrase amongst the fishermen for a prominent-eyed person. Sometimes, from the same cause, it rises faster as it aj^proaches the surface than the line can be hauled in, shooting quite out of the water at some distance from the boat upon its first emergence, like a cork or bladder, from the lightness caused by its great distension. The usual size of these was from two and a half to three and a half feet long, weighing from twenty-five to forty or fifty pounds." The discovery that some fishes live, at an early period of their existence, at or near the surface, and in the course of their growth retire into the depths of the ocean, is due to Lowe. The study of the fishes of Madeira was continued by Mr. J. Y. Johnson, who, between the years 1862 and 1866, made some of the most interesting additions to ichthyology; he discovered important bathybial types, such as Chiasmodus, Melano- cetus, Halosaurus, Synaphohranchus, the Saccopharynx of Mitchell, and others, but he treated them like any other rare surface-fishes, without taking note of their pertinence to a distinct fauna. Each boat is generally furnished with two such lines, each worked by a single fisherman, who is, however, assisted by others in the labour of hauling in the line, which takes from twenty to thirty minutes. EEPOET ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xxi Lowe as .well as Jolmson deposited their treasures in the British Museum, and from these materials chiefly I formed the idea of a special adaptation of the ichthyic type to Imthybial life. The comparison of fishes so widely different as Plagyodus {Ale2ndo- saurus), Eegaleacs, Tr achy icterus, Stylophorus, Saccopharynx, Chiasmodus, Melano- cetus, showed nevertheless a singular agreement in important points of organisation, and even in the circumstances under which their capture took place. And having recognised that the diminished amount of earthy matter in the osseous system, the extreme thinness of the muscular layers of the trunk and tail, the easily ruptured connective ligaments and tissues of the muscles and bones, the increase in size or degradation of the organ of sight, the distensibility of the stomach, the shrinking of the gills, the development of the muciferous system with or without special organs of '■•luminosity, the black coloration of the pharynx and peritoneum, were peculiarities which, either singly or combined, either by themselves or in connection with other evidence, indicated the bathybial nature of the fish, I relegated to tlie deep-sea fauna Plagyodus in 1860, the Trachypteridse and Lophotidae in 1861, Halargyreus and Saccopharynx in 1862, Melaviphaes, Melanocetus, Chiasmodus, a part of the Sternopty- chidse, Scopelidas and Stomiatidse in 1864, the Halosauridse in 1866, Pseudophycis in 1867, and Synaphobranchus in 1870.^ I had no definite information at the time with regard to the depth at which these types habitually live, but I thought it probable that some of them descend to much greater depths than were recorded hitherto, and that the degree of adaptation to a bathybial life increased with the depth reached by the fish ; in fact, that the successive vertical zones of the deep sea were inhabited by fishes of a different and peculiar organisation. This last surmise has not been verified by the facts obtained during the Challenger and subsequent expeditions. But I ascertained, at a time previous to the British Deep-Sea expeditions,^ that deep-sea fishes must have a wide horizontal range, and that consequently the physical conditions of the depths of the ocean must be the same or nearly the same over the whole globe, — a fact already recognised by Risso, though his observations were limited to the district of the Gulf of Genoa (vide supra, p. xix.). The materials brought home by the Challenger laid a .broad and sure foundation of our knowledge of the abyssal fish-fauna, and the preliminary notices of the new and remarkable forms which were published in the years 1877 and 1878^ could not fail to draw the attention of the succeeding explorers of the deep sea to this class of animals. 1. Of the three Norwegian North Atlantic expeditions undertaken in the years 1876, 1877, and 1878, the last furnished much information as regards the deep-sea 1 See Cat. Fish., under the headings of the genera enumerated ; Proc. Zool. Soc. Land., 1864, p. 301 (^Melanocetus); Proc. Zool. Soc. Land., 1866, p. 336 (Ausonia). » Cat. Fish., vol. v. p. 420, 1864. ^ ^,j„_ ^nd Mag. Nat. Hist., 1877, vol. x.\., and 1878, vol. ii. xxii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. fishes of the Polar Sea. The sea between Hammerfest and Varanger Fjord, that extendinty towards Novaja Zemlja and Jan Mayen, and northwards to the north-western extremity of Spitzbergen, were explored. The greatest depth reached by the trawl was nearly 1400 fathoms. About thirty species were collected, of which those of the o-enera Lycodes and Lijjciris, and the genus Rliodichthys are of particular interest. In an elaborate Eeport by Robert CoUett these fishes are described in detail and well figured.^ 2. Thanks to the exertions of Professor A. Agassiz and Dr. Spencer Baird, the Government of the United States j^rovided, at first by the loan of ships, and later through the organisation of the U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries, for a s5'-ste- matic exploration of the depths of the Western Atlantic. Omitting the earliest opera- tions, in which no special attention was paid to deep-sea fishes, we have to mention, in* the first place, the successful trips of the U.S. steamer " Blake," under the command of Lieut. -Com. C. D. Sigsbee and Commander J. N. Bartlett, in the years 1878 to 1880, to the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. The dredging and trawling apparatus used by the Challenger was improved, and in order to ascertain the nature of the fauna at any given depth intermediate between the surface and bottom. Com- mander Sigsbee introduced an apparatus, which works in a vertical, instead of hori- zontal, direction, and which admits animals only at a desired depth. Whatever importance may be attached to the results obtained by it with regard to the distribution of the lower animals, the fact that this apparatus failed to capture any fishes in mid- water is evidence of but negative value. The investigation of the bottom revealed areas devoid of and others rich in animal life, and the causes of such abundance or poverty were approximately ascertained. The operations of the U.S. Fish Commission had to be conducted chiefly with the direct object of developing the commercial resources of the country, but as this object goes hand in hand with, and as its attainment is in great measure dependent on, strictly scientific research, the work of the Commission was carried on in both directions. From the year 1877 the Commission was enabled, by the possession of a suitable steamer, the "Fish-Hawk," to engage in deep-sea operations, chiefly in parts of the Atlantic north of the area surveyed by the " Blake," but occasionally extending southwards into the West Indian Sea, as, for instance, those of 1884 by the U.S. steamer "Albatross." These explora- tions, which were systematically carried out with sound judgment and intimate knowledge of the requirements for deep-sea operations, yielded adequate results ; no other part of the ocean is now better known, with regard to its marine products, than the Atlantic coasts of the United States and the deep water outside the littoral zone. The contributions to the fauna of deep-sea fishes were numerous and of great interest, and have been described chiefly by Messrs. Brown Goode and 1 Deu NorsL-e Nordhavs-Expedition, Zoologie. Fiske. Christiania, 1880, 4°. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xxiii Bean, whose publications will be duly referred to in the descriptive part of this Eeport. So far as the materials have been worked out, they show that fishes recorded by the Challenger from great depths live in much shallower water in other parts of the ocean, and that, on the other hand, many littoral forms descend to within the vertical limits of the deep-sea fauna. The greatest depth from which the capture of fishes is reported was 2900 fathoms, nearly the same as that stated by the Challenger. 3. By the explorations of the Faeroe Channel, in H.M.SS. "Knight Errant" and "Triton," in the years 1880 and 1882, our knowledge of the deep-sea fishes between the British Islands and the Polar Sea was much advanced ; in fact, nothing was known previously about this district. The trawl was used in from 200 to 640 fathoms.^ All the species collected are embodied in the present Report ; they proved to be partly identical with those collected by the Norwegian expedition, and partly closely allied to types which were previously known from the Mediterranean. 4. The deep-sea explorations undertaken by the French Government, and entrusted to a commission under the presidency of Professor Milne-Edwards, began in the year 1880. A vessel, " Le Travailleur," was employed for short periods in three consecutive years, and replaced by the larger " Talisman" in 1883. The field of operations was in the first years the Bay of Biscay, and extended to the Mediterranean and the Canary Islands, but stiU more work was done in the "Talisman," in which the expedition made a series of observations ofi" the coast of Morocco southward to Cape Verde Islands and the Sargasso Sea, and westward to the Azores. From the general reports published it would appear that the materials collected contain important contributions to our knowledge of deep-sea fishes, but no authentic information has been published, with the exception of a supposed new genus, Eurypliarynx. 5. The Italian Government despatched a ship of the Royal Navy, the " Washington," in three consecutive years (1881-3) for the exploration of the depths of the Mediterranean. With regard to abyssal fishes, these expeditions were somewhat barren in results. ' StafY Commander Tizard, R.N., and John Murray, Exploration of the Faaroe Channel, during the summer of 1880 in H.M.'s hired ship " Knight Errant," Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1882. • ^ xxiv THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. CHARACTERISTICS OF DEEP-SEA FISHES/ The physical conditions under which fishes live at a depth of 100 and more fathoms affect certain parts of their organisation. We know now, chiefly from the Norwegian and North America explorations, that many littoral fishes descend within the limits of the truly abyssal fauna. These descents, however, are not permanent removals from the littoral zone, but, at the most, periodical ; and therefore no conspicuous change in any of the organs of these fishes has taken place. But already, in many fishes which permanently reside at from 80 to 120 fathoms, we find indications of their habitat in the black coloration of their pharynx and in the size of their eye, which is proportionally laro-er than in their representatives at the surface. In the true deep-sea fishes certain organs are so conspicuously modified that every one of these fishes may be recognised as a deep-sea fish, without accompanying positive evidence of its capture at a great depth ; and vice versa, fishes reputed to have been obtained at a great depth, and not having any of the characteristics of the dwellers of the deep sea, must be regarded as surface fishes. The question whether the amount of modification is proportioned to the depth, must be negatived from the evidence at present available, inasmuch as deep-sea fishes caught at depths of between 300 and 400 fathoms may show a much more con- spicuous development of abyssal peculiarities than those from 2000 and more fathoms. The tremendous pressure under which deep-sea fishes live must be one of the primary causes affecting their organisation. The pressure of the atmosphere at the level of the sea amounts to fifteen pounds per square inch of the surface of the body of an animal ; but below the surface of the ocean the pressure is increased to a ton weight for every 1000 fathoms of depth. In many deep-sea fishes we find, then, that the osseous or muscular systems, or both, are, as compared with the same parts of surface fishes, very feebly developed, as for instance in the Trachypteridse, Melanocetus, Chiasmodus, Plagyodus, Omosudis, Saccopharynx. The bones have a fibrous, fissured and cavernous texture, are light, with scarcely any calcareous matter, so that the point of a fine needle will readily penetrate them without breaking. In some the primordial cartilage is persistent in a degree rarely met with in surface fishes, and the membrane bones remain more or less membranous or are reduced in extent, like the operculum, which frequently is too small to cover the gills. When the fish is brought to the surface, all the bones, and more particularly the vertebrse, are most loosely connected with one another. Likewise the muscles, especially the great lateral muscles of the trunk and tail, are ihin ; the fascicles can be readily separated or torn, the connective tissue being extremely loose and 1 The contents of this chapter formed the subject of a lecture delivered at Cambridge in 1874, and of the notes published in Introduction to a Study of Fishes, 1880, p. 296. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XXV feeble, so that the specimens require the most careful handling to prevent their breaking up into fragments. This condition appears to obtain in the highest degree in a fish allied to Plagyodus, and occurring in the Madeiran Sea, of which Lowe succeeded in obtaining fragments only. Specimens of this fish are sometimes caught on long lines at great depths, but before they can be hauled to the surface, the body breaks away, leaving fragments only on the hook.^ We cannot assume that this loose connection of the osseous and muscular systems obtains whilst those fishes remain under the normal physical conditions of their abyssal abode. All are carnivorous, and some of them most rapacious creatures, which must be able to execute rapid and powerful movements to catch and overpower their prey ; and for that object their muscular system, thin as its layers may be, must be as strong, and the chain of the segments of their vertebral column as firmly linked together, as in surface fishes. In coming to the surface their body has undergone a change which is merely due to their rapid withdrawal from the pressure under which they lived ; it is a much aggravated form of the afiection that is experienced by persons reaching great altitudes in a balloon, or by the ascent of a mountain. In every living organism with an intestinal tract there are accumulations of free gases ; and, moreover, the blood and other fluids, which permeate every part of the body, contain gases in solution. Under greatly diminished pressure these gases expand, so that, if the with- drawal from a depth is not an extremely slow and gradual process, the various tissues must be distended, loosened and ruptured ; and what is a vigorous fish at a depth of 500 or more fathoms, appears at the surface as a loosely-jointed body, which, if the skin is not of suflicient toughness, can only be kept together with difliculty. At great depths a fibrous osseous structure and a thin layer of muscles suffice to obtain the same results for which, at the surface, thickness of muscle and firm osseous tissue are necessary. The singular circumstance that the first two specimens known of Saccopteryx, two of Ghiasmodus, and one of Omosudis were picked up floating on the surface, dead or in a dying condition, with their stomach distended by a large recently swallowed prey, can be easily explained by the aid of those phj^siological facts. If, during the struggle which must take place between the attacking fish and its prey, the fishes are carried out of their depth into a somewhat higher stratum, the expansion of the gases will cause both to ascend towards the surface, especially if one of them be provided with an air-bladder, and the rate of speed of the ascent will increase the nearer they approach the surface, which they reach dead or in a dying condition, as witnessed and described by Lowe {vide supra, p. XX.). Occurrences of this kind must happen very often, as, of course, comparatively few can by accident fall under the observation of naturalists. In a slight degree the phenomenon described is a matter of every day occurrence, well known to fishermen who fish at depths of from 40 to 80 fathoms. The fishes with- drawn from that depth come up more or less distended, if they possess a closed air-bladder. 1 IViegm. Arch., 1860, p. 123. (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. PART LVII. — 1887.) " I^H '^ XXVI THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLEXGER. By the expansion of the air-bladder the oesophagus and stomach are pressed out of the mouth and the eyes out of their sockets. Cod-fishers are therefore in the habit of puncturing the air-bladder, in order to keep the fish alive. Every larger collection possesses specimens showing the inverted stomach and oesophagus; and they may be safely assumed to have been captured at some distance from the surface. We might expect that the air-bladder of deep-sea fishes would offer special modi- fications ; and, indeed, there is sufficient evidence that in many a special muscular apparatus is developed for the compression or expansion of its contents, to enable the fish to rise into a higher, or descend into a lower stratum. But, unfortunately, in all the specimens examined by me the air-bladder was more or less ruptured and broken up, and destroyed by subsequent decomposition. One point only seems to be clearly made out, viz., that abyssal life has exercised no influence on the development of an air- bladder, that is, deep-sea fishes whose nearest surface-relations possess an air-bladder, are provided with this organ also, and vice versa. In none of the abyssal forms examined by me have I found an open communication between the air-bladder and the oesophagus, not even in those which are referred to the Physostomous division. The branches of the muciferous system are dilated in many deep-sea fishes to an extraordinary degree. Sometimes it is only the lateral line which is conspicuously wider than in the allied surface forms (Lepidopus tenuis, many Scorpsenidse), but in mauj- others, as in Berycidse, Macruridse, Ophidiidse, and Scopelidse, the l^ranches on the head are enlarged into wide cavities, the walls of which are supported by high ridges of the superficial bones. Frequently the membranes investing these cavities are very thin and after the death of the fish liable to be destroyed, so as to leave bare the deeply sculptured surface of the skull ; in other fishes the outer membranes collapse in consequence of the shrinking of the mucous contents of the cavities, so that the surface of the head appears to be extremely uneven ; whilst again in others, as in the majority of the genus Macritrus, the integument is sufiiciently tough to maintain the natural contours of the head. The arrangement of the cephalic branches is the same as in Teleosteous fishes generally: the rostral l)ranches bifurcate into the frontal and infraorbital, and pass into the scapulary branch which is the commencement of the lateral line ; and the mandi- bulary and prgeopercular branches are likewise invariably present. All these cavities and canals are filled with an immense quantity of mucus, which, in specimens that have not been too long preserved in spirits, swells by immersion in water, and can be pressed out of the apertures of the canals. These apertures may be wide slits, or more or less open, or minute pores with or without a tubule. The physiological use of this secretion, as, indeed, the function of the whole system, is not known. Whether it be regarded as an excretory or as a sensory organ, it is clear that its extraordinary development in so many deep-sea fishes must stand in relation to some one of the abyssal conditions under which they live ; and it is very probable that some special function or functions are superadded EEPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XXVll to the original one AYiiicli the muciferous system fulfils in the ordinaxy type of surface fishes. Considering that the majority of the localised and more highly specialised luminous organs are situated within the area of, and stand in relation to, the muciferous system, we may be justified in assuming that one of those additional functions is to surround the fish with luminosity, the more so as the mucus has been actually observed to have phosphorescent properties in newly caught specimens. The so-called phosphorescent organs or luminous bodies have been noticed ever since the first species of Scopelus and other pelagic genera were described ; but they were regarded as peculiar pigment spots or modified portions of the scales. Many species of Scopelus possess, beside the round mother-of-pearl-coloured spots, a pair of whitish gland- like bodies on the upper side of the snout ; and it seems that Cocco was the first to assert that these bodies have phosphorescent properties. He mentions^ these organs as " apparecchio lucido," and one of the species possessing them he named " Nychtophus metojMclampus." Bonaparte copied Cocco's accounts, and Valenciennes" adopted his views as to the function of these organs. In 1864, when engaged in the systematic arrangement of the fishes of the families Sternoptychid^, Scopelidse, and Stomiatidae, I ascribed phosphorescent properties to all these organs, whilst from their histological examinations Leuckart^ and Ussow* declared them, or at least part of them, to be accessory eyes. Leydig' holds the opinion that they are " pseudo-electric " organs, which sometimes may have the function of emitting light ; Emery" adopts the view of their phosphorescent nature in Scopelus. As these organs occur, not only in deep-sea fishes, but also in nocturnal pelagic forms, their function might have been expected to be readily ascertained by actual observation ; however, so far as I am aware, this has been done twice only, viz., by myself, when I happened to notice distinct flashes of light to issue from a dying specimen of Scopelus floating on the surface in the British Channel ; and by Dr. Guppy,' who examined some freshly caught specimens of the same genus. During my examination of the Challenger fishes I found the luminous organs widelj'- distributed over the various organs of the body, and discovered especially their presence, in a unique modification, in a genus of Alepocephalid fishes (Xenodermichthys), as well as in the Halosauridse, in which their relation to the muciferous system is undeniable. Finally, Liitken^ suggested that the white terminations of the dorsal tentacle of Himanto- lophus reinhardti may be phosphorescent during life, which undoubtedly they are. Luminous organs are not equally distributed among the various families of deep-sea 1 Nuovi Ann. d. Sei. Nat, 1838, toiii. ii. p. 1S4. 2 Ciiv. Val., vol. xxii. pp. 443, 444, 445. 2 Ueber luutkmassliche Nebenaugeu bei eineni Fisclie, Bcricht u. d. Vcrsamml. deuisch. Naturf., 1864. * Bull. Soc. unjh des Nat. Moscou, 1879, vol. liv. p. 79. ^ Die augenahnlichen Organe tier Fische, 1881, 8°, Bonn. > » Mittheil. Zool. Stat. Neapel, vol. v., 1884, p. 471. ' Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. ix., 1882, p. 202. * Vidensk. Selsk. Skriv., vol. xi., 1878, p. 341. XXVIU THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEK. fishes ; and it is a remarkable fact that they are almost entirely absent in those which have the muciferous system most developed; thus, neither the Macruridse nor the Ophidiidaj possess specialised luminous organs, probably because the mucus, which is so abundantly secreted, supplies a sufficient amount of luminosity. In the Berycidse and GadidiB we find only isolated instances, which remind us of the praeoeular or rostral orwan of certain Scopdi. On the other hand, the Ealosauri ])ossess a wide lateral-line system with well difi"erentiated luminous organs superimposed on it. In each of the families of Carangidse and Alepoccphalidse one species only is provided with them. In the Pediculati luminous organs are of common occurrence and serve as lures to attract other fishes ; they are most common in the Sternoptychidse, Scopelidse, and Stomiatidse, in which they have principally the function of enabling these fishes to illuminate their surroundings, more rarely of alluring other fishes. In the MurgenidEe no luminous organs have been found ; but in some of them the muciferous system is enlarged. The luminous organs present many modifications as regards their seat, appearance and structure. ' 1. In their most primitive condition they appear as innumerable minute tubercles more or less raised above the surface of the skin, and covering the sides of the body ; they are crowded together in transverse bands corresponding to the segments of the muscular system. This form occurs in Echiostoma, Opostomias, Pachystomias, Photo- nectes, Malacosteu's. I suppose that the pores scattered over the skin of some species of Ceratias (Ceratias uranoscopus, Ceratias canmctdatiis) are apertures of follicles in which luminous mucus is secreted. 2. Larger in size, less numerous and more projecting beyond the surface, are the small nodules in the skin of Xenodermichthys ; they are distributed over the head as well as the body, and follow, on the former, the muciferous ducts, whilst they are arranged in a quincuncial fashion on the Ijody, and are wanting along the tract of the lateral line. 3. More difierentiated are the eye-like spots, of a white colour in preserved specimens, and red or green during life, which are arranged at regular intervals in two series on the lower side of the body of the fish, and which occur also on the head, at the base of the branchiostegals and on the gill-cover. Their arrangement is constant within the limits of a species, and to judge from their external appearance they gradually pass into the next form. They occur in numerous genera : — Gonostoma (some species), Chauliodus, Astroncsthcs, Stoinms, Echiostoma, Opiostomias, Pachystomias, Photonectes, and Idiacanthus. 4. Still more difierentiated are large round fiat organs of a peculiar mother-of-pearl brightness, arranged like the former in rows on the lower side of the body and head, with isolated ones on the sides and on the opercles, and frequently with the addition of a .short dorsal and ventral series on the peduncle of the tail. ^ They are found in the KEPOKT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XXIX families Stcriioptycliidse and Scopelidse only, viz., Gonostoma (Gonostoma denudatum) , Argi/ro2)elecus, Sternoptyx, Polyipnus, PhoticJithya, Scopelus and Nannohrachium. 5. More or less diffuse patches of a white glandular substance of varying thickness are found. a. On the side of the trunk in Astronesthes. h. On the dorsal or ventral sides of the caudal peduncle in Gonostoma and Nanno- hrachium. c. On or near the clavicle and more or less within the gill-cavity in SternoiJtyx, Opostomias and Halosaurus. d. Above the maxillary in the infraorbital region in Gonostoma and PJwtic/ithys. e. On the top of the snout or in front of the eye in species of Melamphaes, Melanonus and Scopelus. f. On barbels in Linophryne, Stomias, Opostomias and Idiacanthus. g. On fin rays in Melanocetus, Chaunax, and Himantolophus reinhardtii. 6. In this group these large glandular masses are differentiated, forming a rounded, more or less oval mass lodged in a cavity of the infraorbital region (as in 5, d), viz., in Anomalops, Echiostoma, Opostomias, Pachystomias, Photonectes, Malacosteus, Idia- canthus, Astronesthes. 7. The luminous apparatus of the dorsal fin is differentiated, representing a cavity with an aperture from which a tentacle or filament may be exserted. This form is found in Pediculates only, such as Hunantolophus, Aegieoniclithys, some species of Ceratias, Oneirodes and Linop>hryne. 8. The luminous organs of Halosaurus difi"er from all those enumerated, inasmuch as they are arranged on the bodj- in a single series which is lodged on the scales of the lateral line ; on the head they follo\\- the lower branches of the muciferous canals ; in fact, they are situated in them. The organs have also a peculiar diamond-shape, and nearly all lie below, but free from, the semitransparent integument of the body. 9. The cephalic organ of Ipnops, the genetic relations of which are still obscure, althouo;h there can be no. doubt as to its function. The disposition of all these organs will be more fully noticed in the following pages, and a complete account of the histology of the more important forms will be given by Professor Moseley and Dr. von Lendenfeld in the Appendices at the end of the Report. y- Light-producing organs are very generally distributed in the abyssal fauna, and those parts of the depths of the ocean in which phosphorescent animals are abundant must be sufficiently illuminated to enable such of them as are provided with well-developed eyes to perceive objects with as much distinctness as do the pelagic forms which sport at the surface at night, and are dependent on the light of the moon and stars and the general phosphorescent light around them. There is no doul^t that fishes contribute XXX THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEE. a considerable amouut of this luminosity of the abyssal depths ; but the various degrees of differentiation of the luminous organs, as well as their location on very different parts of the fish, prove that the production of light is dependent on a variety of circumstances and subserves different purposes. 1 . Lio-ht may be produced by the luminous organ to enable its possessor to see. In fishes which secrete merely a large quantity of luminous mucus without specially developed oro-ans (Macrurid^e), or in which innumerable minute organs are disseminated over the crreater part of the body, the luminosity proceeds from the general surface of the fish whenever the animal is active, and probably ceases whilst it is asleep or at rest. But in those fishes in which the organs are highly developed and specialised, the production of licht is evidently subject to the will of the fish. Only thus can the luminous apparatus be of advantage to the fish ; if the production of light were constant, or could not be suppressed instantaneously, the fish would be a most conspicuous object and fall a ready prey to its enemies. The high degree of development of the luminous organs on the side of the head, in close proximity to the eye, as it is found in Anomalops and the Stomiatidai, can be accounted for only by assuming that these fishes are able at will to shoot rays of light in the direction which they want to explore for the purpose of discovering their prey, or for some other object. In fact these organs are used by them as we would use a " bulls-eye." ThQ circumstance that some of the organs are lodged below memliranes or even in the cavities of the gills or within the mouth, cannot be regarded as an objection to this explanation of their function, as the membranes as well as the bones are semi-transj^arent, and would not much interfere with the eflect. No doubt the intensity of light produced by the various organs is not the same, and it is probably least in those least specialised : perhaps no more than the glimmer produced by a number of minute particles of phosphorus ; but the light which issues from the large pearly organs of the Scopelidse, the infraorbital organs of the Stomiatidse, and from the lenticular organs of the Halosaurid^, must be intense and penetrate to a considerable distance. 2. The luminous organs which are placed on barbels, filamentous fin-rays, or tentacles have evidently the function of attracting other animals and of serving as lures. It is a matter of common observation that aquatic animals are in the dark attracted by a light ; and therefore these appendages will prove most efficient lures in the abyssal darkness, when, with one or several bright phosphorescent spots at the end of the tentacle, they are played about by the fish. Thus, whilst the appendages retain the original function which they have to perform in surface fishes bke LojjJiius, Antennarms, etc., in which they simulate a worm or other similar creature, the means by which the final end is attamed is changed in accordance with abyssal conditions. Their luminous property could not be of any other use to these fishes, many of which, as, for instance, the deep-sea Pediculates, have their eye in a most rudimentary condition. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XXxi I am also of opinion that the highly specialised organs which are placed on the dorsal and ventral sides of the caudal peduncle of many Scopelids and Sternoptychids, have the function of attracting prey, and not of enabling their possessors to see. Situated at the posterior extremity of the body, they would be in a most unfavourable position to throw the light wdthin the area of vision by the eye. On the other hand, when we recollect the peculiar motion of a Scopelus, which darts rapidly in short curves to' the right and left, upwards and downwards, we can understand that these posterior organs are of great assistance to the fish in picking up any creatures which, attracted liy the gleam of light issuing from its tail, are lured into too near a proximity. The explanation that these caudal organs shoot out rays of hght to frighten aw-ay a pursuer, does not seem to me a happy idea. They are, as I assume, subject to the will of the fish, which when pursued would simply extinguish its lantern and escape into darkness ; light w^ould not frighten, but rather attract a pursuer. Special organs of touch are not more generally developed in deep-sea fishes than in the littoral fauna. As such may be considered the ventral filaments of the Ophidiidae, the more or less detached rays of the pectoral fin of Pteroidonus, Microlene and Mixonus, and especially of Bathypterois which possesses but rudimentary eyes, and the pectoral filaments of which remind one of those of the Polynemidae. Indeed, the comparatively rare occurrence of special organs of touch in deep-sea fishes may be used as evidence that the majority depend on the sense of sight for the perception of surrounding objects, and that therefore a la.rge amount of light must be distributed, at least locally, in depths to which the surface light does not penetrate. The excessively elongate fin-rays of young Trachypteridje are evidently not organs of touch ; it is difficult to explain their use in those young fishes ; it might he imagined that they would ])e rather disadvantageous to them by attracting other fishes of prey, unless they afford protection by then- resemblance to delicate fronds of fucus floating in the water or gradually settling towards the bottom. Such delicate filaments can only be developed in fishes sojourning in water which is not subject to violent asjitation. In the subsequent descriptions of deep-sea fishes frequent mention is made of the reduction in size and length of the gill-laminae. These organs appear short and shrunken ; it is possible that they are longer during life, ending in delicate points, and shrunken only in consequence of the action of the spirit, but the horny rods which support the plaits of the mucous membrane are also wanting in firmness, like the parts of the skeleton, and are much shorter than in the ordinary Teleostean type. The lamiuas are also reduced in number, and the gill does not possess the same extent of respiratory surface, so that the intensity of ttie respiratory process seems to be more diminished than in surface fishes. We can hardly doubt that the sojourn in the low temperature of the abyssal depths must have some efiect upon circulation, respiration, assimilation of food xxxii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEE. and secretion ; but we cannot hazard a conjecture as to the manner and degree in which those physiological functions may differ from those of surface fishes. I may here also shortly refer to a subject in regard to which very few facts are known, and which therefore offers wide scope for speculation. It is the fact that the spawn of some deep-sea fishes (as for instance Polyjjrion cernium), is developed at the surface, whilst mature individuals of the species reside at more or less considerable depths. It is not probable that these fishes rise to the surface at the season of propagation ;■ we may rather suppose that the spawn is deposited at a depth of several hundred fathoms and gradually rises to the surface, the young fish, after a short pelagic surface existence, returning to the depths inhabited by their progenitors. This, however, is certainly not the case with all deep-sea fishes ; of many the spawn will not only be deposited at the bottom of the ocean, l)ut also remain there throughout the period of its development. But when we consider the immense diff"erenee of the conditions under which the development of the ova of these two kinds of fishes pro- ceeds— the one under the accelerating influences of light, warmth, and a constant supply of oxygen, the other under the retarding conditions of darkness, cold, and a minimum amount of oxygen — we cannot help thinking that the one series supplies the deep sea with the forms which retain the organisation of the surface fishes, whilst the other develops into those degraded forms, of which the families Ophidiidfe and Mursenidse offer the most striking examples. The colours of deep-sea fishes are extremely simple, their bodies being either black, pink, or silvery ; however, some of the fishes which now are black are described as having been of a bluish colour when they were brought to the surface. In a few only are some filaments or the fin-rays of a bright scarlet colour ; black spots on the fins or dark cross-bars on the body are of very rare occuiTcnce. An extremely common, almost general characteristic of deep-sea fishes is the black coloration of some of the body-cavities ; this is limited to the pharynx in many of the fishes which live about the 100-fjithoms limit, but the colour is more intense, and spread all over the oral, branchial, and peritoneal cavities in strictly typical deep-sea forms. The highly specialised luminous organs on the head of the Stomiaticte are green or pi)ik during life, whilst they fade into white after the immersion of the fishes in spirit. Among the black- coloured deep-sea fishes albinos are not scarce. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xxxiii VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF DEEP-SEA FISHES. Before the voyage of the Challenger scarcely thirty deei^-sea fishes were known ; this number is now increased to about 370, if we include a few species which are, in fact, surface fishes, but descend occasionally or regularly to or even beyond the 100-fathoms limit. In a table appended to these introductory remarks, I have endeavoured to show in a graphic manner the bathymetrical range of each species, so far as it has been ascertained at present. Unfortunately, some uncertainty prevails as regards the depth at which certain specimens were obtained, I formerly assumed that the fishes of the open sea were living either near to the surface or at the bottom, but I think now that Mr. Murray is right in supposing that certain fishes live habitually in intermediate strata, without ever coming to the surface or descending to the bottom.' The function of the pneumatic apparatus with which many deep-sea fishes are provided is to regulate their specific gravity, so that a fish is able to maintain its position at a certain depth, which would vary only within certain limits, comparable to those which we observe in surface fishes. As the mouth of the dredges or trawls used by the Challenger was open during their descent or ascent, it is within the limits of proba- bility that sometimes fishes were accidentally enclosed whilst the apparatus was traversing the strata intermediate Ijetween the surface and bottom. And this has actually happened more than once ; for it is quite certain that common surface fishes, like Sternoptyx and Astronesthes, never ranged to the depth of 2500 fathoms, the depth to which the dredge had descended on the occasion of the capture of these specimens. On the other hand, many of the fishes obtained by the Challenger ofi"er suflicient evidence, from their own organisation, that they live at the bottom, and are unable to maintain themselves suspended in the water ; and, consequently, that they actually were obtained at the depth to which the dredge descended. Besides, the statements of the depths of the Challenger fishes have been confirmed in many instances by the observations made during the more recent deep-sea explorations. However, it may be assumed that of those mid-watei' fishes, as the forms may be called which inhabit intermediate strata, comparatively much fewer specimens are captured than of the bottom fishes. It must be of rare occurrence that fishes accidentally enter the narrow mouth of the dredge whilst it is passing to the bottom or to the surface, and it is more likely to happen when the larger trawl is used. But such free-swimming fishes are much more agile in their movements, and escape more easilj'' on perceiving the 1 The habit of some fishes of living at a distance from the surface ami bottom is a fact which has been known for a long time among fresh-water fishes. Salmo lacustrii, of the Lake of Constance, has received its vernacular name from this habit ; it is called " Schwebe-forelle," that is, the trout which is suspended in mid-water. (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. — PART LVII. — 1887.) Lll 6 XXXIV THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEE. approach of the dredge than bottom fishes, which are generally of a more sluggish nature, and which, seeking safety by burying themselves in the ooze, would be readily enclosed in the dredge. So far as the observations go at present, no distinct bathymetrical zones, characterised by peculiar forms, can be defined. As the transition from the organisation of the typical surface fish to that of the most highly specialised deep-sea form is gradual, so the passage from the Uttoral to the abyssal fauna is continuous and not marked by a sudden change. The limits between the two faunas are still more obscured by the remarkable manner in which they overlap each other owing to the wide bathymetrical range of certain species of either fauna. I need only mention such common littoral forms as Lophius piscatorius, Meiiuccius vulgaris, and Pleuronectes cynoglossus, which descend to depths of from 300 to 700 fathoms, thus living in the same areas which are inhabited by the most highly specialised abyssal forms like Chiasmodus, Trachypterus, and Alepocephalus. Also the temperature of the water clearly interferes mth a uniform bathymetrical dis- tribution of fishes, as many species, which in low latitudes are found at considerable depths, often ascend into the cold surface strata of high latitudes.' Further, nocturnal pelagic surface fishes seek, during the day-time, the darkness of greater depths. The instances of the wide bathymetrical range of deep-sea species are numerous : some may range from a depth of some 300 fathoms down to one of 2000 fathoms ; or, in other words, a fish which has once attained in its organisation to that modification hy which it is enabled to exist under the pressure of half a ton, can easily accommodate itself to one of two tons or more. But if there are serious obstacles to a division of the deep-sea fish-fauna into vertical zones characterised by the presence of peculiar forms, there are less objections to an attempt to show to what limits the families of fishes descend which are represented in the deep-sea by surface-forms or their modifications. As far as our present knowledge goes, we find — 1. That at a depth of 400 fathoms the Gobiidse, Trachinidse (with the exception of Bathydraco), Blenniidae, Percidee, Scorpaenidae, Tricliiuriche, Cyttidse, Cataphracti, Bathythrissidse cease to exist. 2. At a depth of 500 fathoms two important types, viz., the Sharks and Eays, and the Flat-fishes cease to flourish, only one isolated example of each descending beyond that bmit. 3. At 700 fathoms several other families, which are chai'acteristic forms of the littoral fauna of the cold and temperate zones disappear, viz., the Cottidee, Discoboli, and Lycodidse (with one exception); there is also no evidence of the Trachypteridse and Myxine extending beyond this depth. 4 The depth of 1200 fathoms seems to be the limit of the Holocephali. 1 This fact -was first expressed in Introduction to the Study of Fishes, p. 30.5. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. XXXV 5. Beyond 2000 fatlioms neither Gadidse nor Salmonidse nor Notacantlii have been found. 6. The families which descend to the greatest depth at which fishes have been obtained, viz., 2900 fathoms, are Berycidse, Pediculati, Ophidiidse, Macruridse, Sternopty- chidge, Scopehdae, Stomiatidte, Murseuidse ; also two fomilies which have no representa- tives in the surface-fauna, viz., the Alepocephalidse and Halosauridje, extend to the same enormous depth ; and there is no reason why all those deep-sea forms, wliich are known to live at a depth of nearly 3000 fathoms, should not occur in the greatest abyss of the ocean. The abundance and variety of fish life decreases with the depth, as is obvious from the following table, which expresses our present knowledge of the subject. There have been found between 100- 300 fathoms 232 species. 300- 500 „ 142 500- 700 „ 76 700-1500 „ 56 1500-2000 ,, 24 „ 2000-2900 „ 23 Of those found between 100 and 300 fathoms 108 also occur above the 100-fathoms limit. This decrease in the number of species, as shown in this table, is no doubt partly owing to the difficulty of capturing fishes at great depths, a difficulty which increases in proportion to the depth at which the dredge is worked. But it must also be regarded as evidence of the actually diminished variety of fishes. Fishes may Ije, and no doubt are, locally abundant at the bottom of the ocean ; but this abundance is probably one of individuals rather than of distinct forms. We may safely assume, that as the majority of deep-sea fishes are modifications and derivatives of surface forms, they are fewer in number than the latter, especially when we consider that the physical conditions of the abyss are of a very uniform character, and therefore cannot have given rise to the development of numerous specific and generic forms. This uniformity of the physical character of the lowermost strata of the ocean is also the cause of the almost unlimited horizontal distribution of deep-sea fishes. Pelagic surface-fishes have already a wide range, but are more or less influenced in their distribution by climatic conditions. Deep-sea fishes are no longer subject to this cause of limitation when they have reached a deptli of 500 fathoms, where the temperature of the water is as low as 40° F., and perfectly independent of that of the surface water. Therefore, the instances already known of the same genera, and even of the same species occurring in the depths of the eastern and western, northern and southern xxxvi THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. hemispheres are numerous, and will be still more increased by future investigations. A certain number of the species are no doubt more localised ; those will be chiefly such as have been derived, and are not yet far removed in their organization, from littoral forms. Others, which may be supposed to have been derived from pelagic surface fish, may have been as widely distributed, almost from the beginning of their existence, as their ancestors. At present, however, our knowledge of the actual distribution of deep-sea fishes is much too imperfect to be used as a safe basis for further generalisations. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xxxvii THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FISH-FAUNA OF THE DEEP SEA. If, as has been done in the present Eeport, all species which hitherto have been found at a depth of 100 fathoms are included in the deep-sea fauna, so great an admixture of surface forms is admitted, that the characteristic features of abyssal fauna are obscured. We obtain a more correct idea of its constitution if we take into consideration only such forms as have been found from 300 fathoms downwards ; eliminating from the total number of 385 species enumerated in this Report all which do not descend to 300 fathoms, 155 in number. This leaves 230 true abyssal forms. Of this number the Chondropterygians furnish 8 species or 31 Holocephah )) 2 >) 1 Acanthopterygians jj 64 >> 26 Berycidae • S) 24 >> 101 Pediculati )J 7 )) Trachypteridse JJ 7 )> Scorpsenidse J) 5 )> Discoboli J> 5 >j Percidse )J 4 )) Trichiuridse )) 4 J) Cottidse ») 3 >> Cataphracti >) 2 j> Cyttidas )> 1 )) Trachinidse J) 1 )) Lophotidse )5 1 >) Anacanthini )) 91 )) 40 Lycodidfe >) 13 5) Gadidse 5) 19 )5 9 Ophidiidae )) 20 )) 9 Macruridse )) 37 >1 16 Pleuronectidse » 4 )) Physostomi 3J 63 )J 26 Scopelidae 5» 17 )) Mursenidse J) 13 JJ Stomiatid^ )J 10 it Alepocephalidse )J 9 >J XXXVIII THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Halosauridse SternoptyehiclEe Salmonidge Notacanthi Bathythrissidae Cyclostomi furnish 5 species. 4 2 2 1 9, or 1 per cent. As regards the abundance of individuals the Macruridse seem to surpass all the other forms ; then follow the Ophidiidse and Gadidfe. Scopelidge and Stomiatidse are likewise numerous, much more so than the Berycidse, although these latter are represented by a greater number of species. xl THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distnhution 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 ' — . — ^ 1 700-1000 Sharks— i Scyllium canescens, Pristiurus melatioatomus, Spinax spinax, Spinaie granulosa, — • Centrophorus foHaceiiS, ^— Cenlrophorus cmloUpis, Ceivtrophorm squamulosus. . CenlroscylHumfabricii, Centroscyllium gramilatum, . • ^^" Lxmargjis borcalis, . . . • • Eays— Baja isotrachys, • — Baja circularis, Raja radiata, . Raja hyperborea, Rajaplutonia, . Raja batis, Raja vomer, Rajafullanica, ^— Raja nidrosiensis, • Urolophus kaianus, — HOLOCEPHALA— Chimara monstrosa, ..... Chirruera affinis, ..... ACANTHOPTERYGJ 1 — Percidse — Anthias megalepis, — . CerUropristis pUurospilus, — • • . . Sambrops chilodipteroides. • -- Aoropoma philippiiieiise, ■ ■- . . Propoma roseum. — • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 REPOET ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xli of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 \ ■ ■ ■ ■ (ZOOL. CHAT.Ti. EXP. — PART LVII. — 1887.) LU/ xlii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution jMalacicMhys griscus, Synagrops japonicus, Polyprion cemium, Scorpsenidffl — Scorpxna dactyloptera, Scorpsstia kuhlii (see Lowe), Sebastes marinus, Setastes vimparus, Sebastes macrochir, Sebastes hexcmema, Sebastes oculatus, Setarches fidjUnsis, Setarches parmatus, Setarches guntlieri, Bathysebastes albescens, Lioscorpiiis longiceps, . Beryeidse — Hoploslethiis iiuditerraiKum, Tracliichthys australis, Trachichlhys jacksoniensis, Trachichthys elongatus, Trachichthys ferrumdezianus, Trachichthys traillii, , Trachichthys inacleayi, Trachichthys intermedins, TrachicMhys darwinii, Anoplogaster cornutus, Caulolepis langidens, . Melamphaes microps, . Melamphaes typhlops . Melampliaes megalops, MelampJiaes crassiceps, 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xliii of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 1 xliv THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distrihtition 0-100 100-200 300-500 500-700 700-1000 Melamphaes mizoUpis, Melamphaes roiustus, Melamphaes leanii, ifelarnphaes suborbitalis, Malacosarcus mncrostoma, Slepkanoberyx inonx, Beryx decadaciyliis, Bcnjx spUndens, Polymixia noUlis, Poromitra capita, Myripristis Icaianus, Trichiuridje — Nealotus tripes, Aphanopus carho, Nesiarchus nasiUtis, Lepidopus caudatus, Lepidop^LS tenuis, Lepidopus elongatus, Trichiurus leplurus, Euoxymetopon tmniatus, Euoxymetopon poeyi, Thyrsites pretiosus, Thyrsites prometTieus, Gempylus serpeiis, Carangidse — Anomalops palpebratus, Cyttidae — Cyttus dbbreviattts, Antigonia capros, Coryphaenidae — Direlmus argenteus, Diretmus aureus, Schcdophilus medusophagus, -(?) -(?) -(?) -(?) -(?) --(?) -(?) REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xlv of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1600 1500-2000 2000-2900 xlvi THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution 0-100 100-300 300-500 600-700 700-1000 SchedopMlus lockingtmii, .... Sckedophiltcs enigmaticus, .... (0 _. nx • 87 88 y:j Trachinidse — Bathydraco antarcti&iis, .... • 89 Aphrilis gobio, . . 90 Aca7ithaphritis grmviisguainis, • 91 Champsodon varax, ..... 92 ■ Uranoscopus Jcaianus, ..... 93 Notothenia mizops, ..... ..- — 93a Pediculati— Lophius pixr/iimius, ..... Lophitis naresii, ..... 94 95 Himantolophus groenlandieus, Himantolophus reinhardli, .... Aegmonichthys appelii, .... Ceratias bispinosus, ..... -----H^ . n> 96 — \i) (7\ 97 98 99 Ceratias holbolli, ..... {i\ — (U 100 Ceratias uranoscopus, ..... , 1 Ceratias carunetdatus, .... , 2 Oneirodes esehrichtii, ..... _. — (?) 3 Mcla7iocetus johiisonii, ..'.., 4 Melanocetus murrayi, ..... 5 Linopkryne lucifer, ..... , (?) 6 C%aM!Ma; ^>irfM«, ..... ffalieutsea senticosa, ..... 7 8 DibrancJius ailanticus. . ^.^ 9 Cottidae— Coltunculas microps, ..... 1 10 Cottunculiis thomsonii, .... Cottus bathybius, .... Ceiitridermichthys wieinatus, .... • • 11 12 /ceZus limnatiis, .... 13 Triglops pingelii, • ■ . . . 14 1 1 • 15 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xlvii of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 93a 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 . • xlviii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 Trigla leptaamthus, ..... • Lepidotrigla spiloptera, .... • Cataphracti — ■ Peristetlvus miniatuvi, ..... Peristethus molitccense, .... Peristethus murrayi, ..... Peristethus liorhynehus, .... Peristethus micrcmema, . . . . — Agonus decagonus, ..... Discoboli — Cyclopterus spinosus, ..... . . Liparisfahrioii, ..... . Liparis mieropus, ..... Liparis gelatinosus, ..... Paraliparis bathybius, .... , . Paraliparis Uparinus, .... . . , Paraliparis membranaceus, .... • • Gobiidse — Callimymm kaiamia, ..... ■^ . . CalUonymus calaurspomus, .... Blenniidie — Anarrhichas minor, .... Anarrhiehas latifrons, .... Blenniops ascanii, ..... Trachypterida — • . Trachypterus, ...... Stylophortis, ...... (?) . Begalecas, ...... Lophotidffi— . Lophotcs, ...... • 1 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. xlix of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 ' 1 2000-2900 (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. — PART LVII. — 1887.) mg THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 Phartngoonathi— Eeliastes roseus, ..... Anaoanthini — Lycodidse — • • Lycodes reticulatus, Lycodes frigidus, Lycodes pallidum, Lycodes seminudus, Lycodes mursena, Lycodes sarsii, Lycodes vcrrilli, Lycodes paxillus, Lycodes paxilloides, I/ycodonus mirabilis, Chjitinelis i>iridis • 1 1 1 • 1 - • • • • MelttThostiOTnct Qelcttiuosum Gadidfe — • Gadus poutassou, Gadus argentcus, Gadus minutus (see Risso), Mora incditerranea. • Halargyreus johnsmiii, Melanomts gracilis, Mcrluccius vulgaris, . Hypsiconictcs gobioides, Lotclla marginata, ... Uraleptus maraldi (see Risso), Physiculus dalwigkii, • Physieulus Tcaupi, Physiculus peregrinus, Phycis blennioides. — — 1 141 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 62 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. li of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 141 42 43 H 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 lii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution Phyds chesteri, Phycis regius, . Phyds americanus, Phycis tenuis, . Lxmouema iarhatMlum, Ealaporphyrus guentheri, HalaporphyrVjS lepidion, Haloporphyrus cqucs, . ffaloporphyrus inoeimse, ffaloporphynis ensiferus, Antimora rostrata, Antimora viola, Molva molva, . Molva abyssorum. Onus macropJithalmiis, Onus carpenteri, 0}ms reinhardli. Onus scptentrionalis, Onus ensis, Onus cvmhritis, Brosmius hrosmc, Chiasmodus niger, OphidiidiE — Barathrodemus inanatiims, Neobythites grandis, Neohythites niacrops, . Neohythiles ocellatus, . . Neobythites gillii, Calsetyx messieri, Pteridium atrum, Pteroidonus quinquarius, Dicrolene intronigra, . Mixonus laticeps, 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 170 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 200 1 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. liii of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 '1 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Q1 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 !00 1 Uv THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution £cUhyonus compresms, Bathyomus tasnia, Bathyomis catena, Porogadus gracilis, Porogadus miles, Porogadus rostratus, . Nematonus pectoralis, . ZHplacantTiopoma brachysoma, Acanthonus armalus, . Typhlonus nas^is, Aphyonus gelatinosus, Ophidium murxnolepis, Rhodichthys regiiia, Macruridse — Macrurus parallelus, . Macruriis japoniciis, . Macrurus australis, Macrunis ccelorhynch'us, Macrurus carminatus, Macrurus /asciaius, Macrurus fabricii, Macrurus rudis, Macrurus nasutus, Macrurus serrulaiiis, Macrurus selerorhynclms, Macrurus sequalis, Macrurus bairdii, Macrurus goodii, Macrurus hololrachys, Macrurus asper, Macrurus carinaius, Macrunis rupestris, Macrurus altipinnis. 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 202 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 EEPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. Iv of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 202 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 U 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . . 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1 Ivi THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Dislnhution MacTurus longibarhis, Maci-urus italicus, MaCTUTUs filicavda, Macmrus microlepis, Macrurus viUosus, Macmrus crassiceps, Macrurus leptolepis, Macrurus simulus, Macrurus femMndeziarms, Macrurus liocephaZus, Majcrurus murrayi, Macrurus derUiculaius, Macrurus Isevis, Macrurus macrochir, Macrurus sulcatum, Macrurus amiaius, Macrurus affinis, Macrurus longijilis, Trachyrhynchus trachyrhymhus, Trachyrhynchus longiroslrw, Trachyrhynchus murrayi, Balhygadus cottoides, . Bathygadus multifilis, Balhygadus cavemosus, Bathygadus macrops, . Bathygadus longijilis, Macruronus novx-zelandiie, Ateleopodidae — Ateleopus japonicus, . Pleuronectidae — Eippoglossus pinguis, . Hippoglossoides platessoidcs, Poedlopsctia colorata, . 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 -(?) EEPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. Ivii of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. PART LVII. 1887.) LU/i Iviii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEE. Vertical Range of Distribution 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 AnticUJiarus pohjspilus, Samaris maculatus, Lepidopsetta maculata, Pseudorhomius Jiectoris, Pseudorhombus hoops, . Psevdorhomius oblongus, Pseudorhombus ocellalus, Monolene sessilkauda, CitJiaricMhys arctifrons, Citharichthys unicornis, Pleuronectes heanii, Pleuronedes cynoglossus, ■ Nematops microstoma, Solea TcaiaiM, . Aphoristia nebulosa, . Phtsostomi — Steruoptychidte — ArgyropcUcus hemigymnus, Argyropelecus olfersii, Slernoptyx diaphana, . Polyipnus spinosus, Gonostoma denudatum, Gorwstoma elongalum, Gonostoma gracile, Gonostoma microdon, . Photichthys argenteus, Chauliodus sloanii, Scopelidte — Saurus kaianvs, Harpodon microchir, . Bathysaurus fcrox, Balhysaurus agassizii, Bathysaurus mollis, ■(?) REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. lix of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 1 Ix THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 Tl It. J • 7.. 'J??."- Bathypterois longijilis, Bathypterois longipes, . • Bathypterois longicavda, Bathypterois gicadrijilis, Ipnops murrayi, Chlorophthalmus agassizii, Chlorophthalmus productiis, Chlorophdudmus nigripinnis, Chlorophthahmcs gracilis, Scopelus macrolcpidotus, Scopeliis gladalis, Scopelus engraulis, • Scopelus dumerilii. Nannobrachium nigrum, Odontostomus hyalinus. Omosudis lowii, -^— Plaavodus ferox Stomiatidse — ^stTonesthes niaer Stomias hoa, . Stomias afflrds, Stomias ferox, Echiostoma lariat um, Opostomias micripnus. Pachystomias nviarodon, Photonectes alhipinnis. ft) Malacosteus niger. (?) Malacosteus indicus, . BatTwphihis nigerrimus. (?) . Idiacanthus fasciola, . --(?) Idiacanthus ferox. Salnioiiidce — Argentina silus, ... . _l 295 96 97 98 99 300 1 2 3 i 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. Ixi of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 Ixii THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Vertical Range of Distribution Argentina lioglossa, Argentina elongata, Sathylagits atlaviicus, Bathylagus atUarcticus, Bathythrissidse— Bathythrissa dorsalis, Alepocephalido;^ Alepocephalus roslraius, Ahpoccphalus agassizii, Alepocephalits productus, Alepocepltalus hairdii, Alepocephalus niger, . Bathytrodes macrolepis, Balhytroctes micralepis, Bathytroctes rostratus, Plalylroctes apus, Xenodermichikys nodulosus, Halosauridffl — Saloaaurus owenii, Ealosaurua macrochir, Halosaurus mediorostris, Halosaurus rostratus, . Halosaurus affinis, Notacanthi — Notacanthics scxpim's, . Notacanthus nasus, Notacaiithus phasganorus, Notacanthus honapartii, Notacanth us rissoanus, Mui-itnida; — Cougromuraina guttulata, Sijiienchelys parasiticus, Neltastoma melanurum. 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 -(?) 326 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. Ixiii of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2900 (?) ^ Ixiv THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGEE. Vertical Range of Distribution ■ 0-100 100-300 300-500 500-700 700-1000 Nettastoma parviceps, Nettastoina procerum, Synaphobranchiis pinnatus, Synaphdbramlms bathybius, . • Synaphobraruohus brcvidorsaU% Saccopharynx ampullaceus. Saccopharynx pelecanoides, Saccopharynx bairdii, NemicMhys scolopaeea, Nemichtkys infans, Cyema atrum, • i ■ • Pleotognathi— Triacanthodes anomalus, .... . . Manamntkus tesstUatus, .... • • . Cyclostomata — Myxine glutinosa, ..... ■ • • 354 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 368 KEPOllT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. Ixv of Species, Genera, and Families. 1000-1500 1500-2000 354 55 56 57 58 59 2000-2900 60 61 62 63 64 65 67 S68 (ZOOr,. CHALL. EXP. — PART [.Vlt.- -1 887.) LU »■ DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES. PLAGIOSTOMATA. SELACHOIDEI— SHARKS. Family Scylliid.e. Scyllium, M. and H. The species of " Dog-fishes " hitherto known are strictly littoral, and, besides, have but a limited distribution. It is therefore a matter of some interest to find a species living at so great a depth as 400 fathoms, although there is nothing in its organisation which would have led us to suspect its bathybial habits. Sci/Uium canescens (PI. I. fig. A). Sajllium canescens, Giinth., Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. ii. p. 18, 1878. The nasal valves are separate from each other, the distance between them being less than the length of a nasal opening ; each is provided with a cirrus. Lengtli of the prgeoral portion of the snout much less than its width, or than the width of the mouth. Labial fold very short. Teeth very small, those of the lower jaw tricuspid, the cusps being subequal in length. Ventral fin with the posterior margin very oblique. The posterior dorsal slightly longer than the anterior. The anal terminates below the middle of the second dorsal, its base being longer than that of the latter fin, and equal to its distance from the caudal. The whole body rough from small spines. Uniform greyish ; all the fins, except the caudal, tipped with white behind. Habitat. — South-western coast of South America, Station 310 ; depth, 400 fathoms. One specimen, 11 inches long (young female). (ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. PART LVII. 1886.) LU 1 5 2 , THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Pristiurus, Bonaparte. Fristiurus melanostomus, Rafinesque. CoUett' records the capture of this littoral species near Tromso, at a depth of 250 fathoms. Family Notidanid^. Chlamydoselache, Garman. Chlamydoselaci,e anguinea (Pis. LXIV., LXV.). Chlamydoselachus anguineus, Garman, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. xii. No. 1, 1885. I am indebted to M. S. Tegima and A. Sanders, Esq., for three well-preserved examples of this shark, which hitherto was known from a single specimen onl)^ a female without intestines, and with a mutilated tail. Our specimens were caught in deep water in Yeddo Bay, opposite Tokio. Two are males, of which the larger is 4 feet and 10 inches long, the tail measuring 2 feet ; the third is a female, which had been eviscerated by the fishermen, from whom it was bought. I am alilc to supplement Mr. Garman 's account by some remarks on the male claspers and other organs. The membranous margin of the ventral fin of the male is attached to the outer and upper side of the clasper, leaving only the terminal third of the latter free, as is the case in the Notidanidse generally, whilst in other sharks the fin and the clasper are separated by a more or less deep notch (PI. LXIV. fig. C). The skeleton of the clasper is extremely simple (PI. LXIV. fig. D, D'). The principal cartilaginous rod (a) is attached to the basale (h) of the pelvic limb by three rudimentary and one larger intermediate cartilages {a'). The ventral side of its terminal third is longitudinally concave, forming a half-canal which in its middle is bridged over by a lobe-like expansion of the cartilage (/). A long calcified piece {t, t') with sharp cutting edge is movably attached to each side of the end of the semicanal. These two movable appendages can be approached to each other so as to complete or close the canal. The structure is therefore very similar to that of Acanthias as figured by Gegenbaur.^ The cartilaginous ray (?■) nearest to the clasper (or pterygopodium, Petri) is much elongate, tapering, simple, occupying a position at about equal distance from the clasper and the ray next above it. This latter {>•'), the penultimate of the series, is also elongate, and consists of two pieces subequal in length, with a minute terminal piece, the rudimentary condition of which leads me to suppose that it will not be found to be constant. The third ray (r") is somewhat shorter than the second, consisting of two pieces, like the second, but without the rudimentary terminal. The following rays become successively shorter, are composed of three pieces, and arranged closely side by side, as in the female fish figured by Garman. > Nyt Mag.f. Natuniid, xviii., 1884, p. 117. - Jenaische Zeitschr., v., Taf. xvi. figs. 15-17. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. 3 The teeth (PI. LXIV. figs. A and B) are arranged with great reguLirity in series crossing the jaws obliquely. Each anterior series consists of six, and the posterior ones of five teeth, to which generally from one to three in an immature state of development are added. The series are separated from each other by a toothless space which becomes narrower between the posterior series ; the latter are composed of much smaller and rudimentary teeth ; in fact, the last two or three series are almost confluent, rendering the number of series somewhat uncertain, so that it may be given as twelve or thirteen on each side of the upper jaw. There is a broad toothless space in the middle of the upper jaw, and the two or three foremost series are bent outwards beyond the margin of the jaw, so that the two or three foremost teeth are entirely outside the buccal cavity. The lower jaw is armed with one unpaired additional series on the symphysis ; in other respects, with regard to position, arrangement and number, the teeth of the lower jaw do not differ from those of the upper. Each tooth consists of an oblong base bearing on its anterior portion three long, divergent, pointed, spine-like cusps, with a pair of much smaller ones between. These cusps are directed backwards over the base of the tooth. On its lower side the base has anteriorly a pair of shallow grooves [g] to receive two short pointed processes (/j).in which the base of the preceding tooth terminates ; by these processes fitting into the grooves of the succeeding tooth, the union of the links of the dental chain is effected. In the rudimentary teeth of the posterior series the base of each tooth is veiy much abbreviated ; the cusps also are much shorter and have a more erect position. In the teeth of the series which may be considered the last, the outer cusp is even entirely lost or quite rudimentary ; in fact, these minute teeth differ very little from the enlarged papillfe of the surrounding skin. The stomach is an extremely long cylindrical sac with thin walls ; the short and narrow intestine, after having made a short and incomplete convolution, passes into the dilated portion which contains the spiral valve. This portion (PI. LXV. figs. 5 and 6) has extremely strong muscular walls, from 3 to 4 mm. thick. The spiral valve makes thirty- five gyi-ations, this part of the intestine being six and a half inches long. A globular glandular body (fig. 3, gl) of the size of a large pea lies dorsad of the cloaca, into wliich it discharges its secretion by a short duct. The liver consists of two extremely long lobes which reach backwards to the end of the abdominal cavity, and anteriorly receive the gall-bladder between them ; this organ is of moderate size. The testicles are narrow elongate bodies of nearly equal size, about 5 inches long and half an inch broad at the broadest part. Although our specimens seem to be sexually mature, I am uncertain whether they were captured during the season of propagation. The testicles reach close to the upper end of the abdominal cavity. In one of the males the arrangement of the urogenital organs and ducts, as well as of the external openings, is perfectly symmetrical and normal (fig. 1), whilst in the other the left side shows a 4 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. much more developed condition than the right (figs. 2 and 3). In the latter specimen the left vas deferens (vd) is much wider than the right (vd'), and provided in its interior with low, circular, closely-set septa (fig. 4), of which only faint traces can be seen in the right duct. They are, however, limited to the lower 3 or 4 inches of the duct. The leit vas deferens opens into the urinary bladder (fig. 3, u), if a bottle- shaped dUatation which terminates externally in a single small conical papilla (uf) may be so called. The right vas deferens opens by a slit at the side of the papilla directly into the cloaca (figs. 2 and 3, ug). There is also in this specimen only one porus abdominalis in the median line (or very slightly to the left of it) immediately behind the cloaca (figs. 2 and 3, po). The comis arteriosus (figs. 7 and 8) is of considerable length, slightly bent towards the right, and of nearly the same diameter throughout. No special valve separates it from the ventricle. I find the valves much more regularly arranged than would appear from the figure given by Garman. They form three longitudinal and six transverse rows (fig. 8). The largest are those of the distal transverse row, placed close to the end of the conus, and somewhat more distant from the next row than the five other rows are from each other. The next largest valves are those of the proximal row, those of the second and third being smaller, and those of the fourth still smaller, with only partially free anterior margins ; the valves of the fifth row are quite rudimentary, and two of them merely indicated as raised papillae, which are confluent with those of the fourth row. Finally, a fourth intermediate longitudinal series is indicated by two minute valves, belonging to the first and second transverse rows. The larger valves are provided with tendinous chordae. Family S p i n a c i d ^. Spiimx, M. and H. Spinax spmax, L. The common European species is reported by Strom ' to be common in Throndjhem Fjord, at a depth of from 70 to 300 fathoms. Spinax granulosus. Spinax granulosus, Giinth., Report on the Shore Fishes, Zool. Chall. Exp., jmrt vi. p. 19, pi. ii. 2, fig. C. Habitat. — South-western coast of South America, Station 305a ; depth, 125 fathoms. One specimen, 10^ inches long. Centrophorus, M. and H. The two Japanese species here described live at about the same depth as the Atlantic species, all of which have been hitherto found in the Mediterranean, oft' Madeira, and on ' Norsk. Vid. SeUk. Skrift., 1884, p. 44. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. 5 the coast of Portugal. With the exception of a specimen taken near Gloucester on the coast of Massachusetts, and of three very young examples obtained l)y Bleeker in the East Indian Archipelago, no other representative of this genus has been found in any other part of the globe ; and therefore the distribution of this genus is an additional proof of the extraordinary resemblance of the Japanese and Madeiran marine faunas. Centropliorusfoliaceus, n. sp. (PI. II. fig. A). Snout much produced, the mouth being nearer to the first giU-openiug than to the end of the snout. The distance between the nostrils is two-sevenths of the length of the prseoral portion of the snout. The labial fold extends a little way along the margins of the mouth ; the angle of the mouth being received into a deep longitudinal slit in the skin. The anterior teeth of the upper jaw triangular, erect, the lateral slightly oblique ; they are arranged in two regular rows. No median tooth in the lower jaw. Pectoral short, with the lower angle rectangular, not produced. Dorsal spines strong, nearly as high as the fins. The first dorsal fin rather lower than the second, but with its base longer, the length of the base (without spine) being two-fifths of the distance between the two fins. Extremity of the ventral fin a little behind the dorsal spine. The scales are pedunculate, terminating in three spines, of which the middle is the longest, corre- sponding to a strong median keel on the scale. Uniform greyish. Habitat. — Off" Inosima, Japan, Station 232; depth, 345 fathoms. One specimen (young male), 16 inches long. Centrophorus ccelolepis. Centroseymnus cmlolepis, Socage and Capello, Proc. ZooL Soc. Lond., 1864, p. 263, fig. 4; and Peix. Plagiost., p. 30, pi. ii. fig. 3. „ Wright, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 1868, vol. ii. p. 426. Centropliorvs codolepis, Giinth., Fish., vol. viii. p. 423. Probably all the European species of Centrophorus live at great depths, but the present is the only one of which we know this to be the case from actual observations, made by Dr. E. Percival Wright. He found the Portuguese fishermen fishing for them in 400 or 500 fathoms, with a Hue of some 600 fathoms in length. "The sharks caught were from three to four feet long ; as they were hauled into the boat, they fell down into it as so many dead pigs. There could be no reasonable doubt that they were inhabitants of the same great depth as Hyalonema." This species is obtained off" the coasts of Portugal and Madeira, and was once found off" the coast of Massachusetts. Centrophorus squaimilosus, n. sp. (PI. II. fig. B). Snout much produced, the mouth being nearly midway between the first giU- opening and the end of the snout. The distance between the nostrils is two-fiftlis 6 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. of the length of the prseoral portion of the snout. The labial fold extends a little way along the margins of the mouth. Upper lip fringed. Pectoral short, with the lower ano-le rounded, not produced. The first dorsal fin small, its base (without spine) is shorter than that of the second, and nearly one-sixth of the distance between the two fins. Spines very small, scarcely projecting beyond the skin. Extremity of the ventral fins below the end of the second dorsal. The scales are tricuspid, with a median keel, and so minute as to give a velvety appearance to the skin. Uniform deep black. Habitat. — Off Inosima, Japan, Station 232 ; depth, 345 fathoms. One specimen (adult female), 27 inches long. The structure of the intestinal tract does not essentially differ from that of the ordinary littoral or pelagic Selachian type. The stomach consists of two portions ; the anterior is much the larger, of an elongate form, narrowed towards its posteiior extremity ; it passes by an abrupt bend into the second reverted portion, which is the narrowest part of the intes- tinal tract. The commencement of the intestine is a wide diverticulum, separated from the stomach by the circular pyloric valve. The intestine proper is almost straight ; the spiral valve commences on the level of the posterior extremity of the stomach, the spire being composed of fifteen transverse gyrations. Csecal appendage worm-shaped, nearly an inch long, with a very narrow cavity. The intestinal tract contained nothiiig but the single beak of a cuttle-fish. The liver consists of two extremely long and flat lobes extending on the right as well as on the left side from the anterior to the posterior extremity of the abdominal cavity. Anteriorly they are connected by a short transverse strip not broader than the lateral portions, and having imbedded in its middle line a gall-bladder of moderate size. The ovaries are paired, containing mature ova, three in the right half and five in the left. In the oviducts no separate divisions can be distinguished, the whole of their cavity being coated with numerous longitudinal folds, the edges of which are beset with villi. They are confluent anteriorly, and attached in the median line to the ventral side of the abdominal cavity; their single opening is directed backwards towards the Fallopian tubes and surrounded by a thick swollen j)ad of soft membrane, the surface of which is finely transversely lamellated. ^ The valves of the conns arteriosus of the heart are arranged in five transverse series, each series consisting of three principal valves and as many intermediate smaller ones. Centroscyllium, M. and H. Centroscyllium fabricii, Reinhardt. This Greenland shark has recently been discovered otf the const of Massachusetts, whence the British Museum received through the Smithsonian Institution a specimen captured in 250 fathoms. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. 7 Centvoscyllium gmmilatum. n. sp. The discovery of a specimen of this Arctic genus in the opposite hemisphere is highly interesting ; unfortunately the specimen is in such a deteriorated condition, that we can ascertain from it scarcely anything beyond its generic characters. Specifically, it must be very closely allied to CentroscyUium fabricii, having the same disposition of the fins, size of teeth and dorsal spines, but the epidermoid productions of the head and body are much coarser, and in the form of granulations, whilst in CentroscyUium fabricii they are minute. Habitat. — Port Stanley, Falkland Islands, Station 311; depth, 245 fathoms. One specimen, 11 inches long. Lwmargus, M. and H. Lsemargus borealis, Scoresby. Common in the North Atlantic, and frequently found on the surface ; but habitually living at a considerable depth (150 to 300 fathoms), at least on the coast of Norway. ^ BATOIDEI— RAYS. Raja, Cuv. Raja isotrachys, n. sp. (PL 111.). Snout rather produced, the anterior margins meeting at nearly a right angle. The width of the interorbital space equals the length of the orbits. The distance between the outer margins of the nostrils equals their distance from the end of the snout. Teeth small, each with a point directed backwards towards the interior of the buccal cavity. Outer pectoral angle rounded, but the margins of the fin would meet at a right angle. Body and tail entirely covered on the upper surface with minute asperities, each with a stellate base. No spines on the superciliary margin. A single small spine in the middle of the back. A series of rather strong spines (eighteen) along the median line of the tail, none on the sides. Upper parts uniform, brownish-grey ; lower parts smooth, brownish-black. Distance between tlie snout and vent, . . . . . 10 inches. Length of the snout, ....... -^ i, Width of the body, ....... 13 „ Length of the tail, . . . . . . • 12^ „ 1 Strom, Norsh Vid. Selsk. Skrift., 1884, p. 44; CoUett, A^ Mag.f. Naturiid., .wiii., 1884, jj. 117. 8 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Habitat. — South of Japan, Station 235 ; depth, 3G5 fathoms. One specimen, female. Raja circularis, Couch. Of the Sandy Kay, only one specimen, a female, 1 5 inches long, was obtained on the cruise of the "Triton" in the Faroe Channel, at a depth of 516 fathoms (Station 10, August 24, 1882). Also CoUett^ reports its occurrence in 130 and 870 fathoms off the coast of Norway. The Faroe specimen does not differ in its armature from specimens obtained on the south coast of England, only the spines on the upper side of the snout and the inter- orbital spa ;e are somewhat more developed, though in this respect littoral specimens show likewise some variation. With regard to colour, it is notable that the spot on each side of the back which, in littoral specimens, is variegated with yellow, is much smaller in the deep-sea specimen, and uniformly black, without yellow. The lower parts are nearly uniform blackish-brown, which colour laps over to the upper side of the ventral fins. Tail with irregular brownish cross-bands. Raja radiata, Donovan. This species, which is widely distributed on the coasts of Northern Europe and North America, has been met with in the sea between Bear Island and Spitzbergen at depths of from 127 to 259 fathoms ;' and in Throndhjem Fjord in 250 fathoms.^ Raja hyperhorea (PL TV".). Baja hyperhorea, Collett, Forhandl. Videusk. Selsk. Christ., 1878, p. 7 ; Norsk. Nordh. Exped. Zool. Fisk., p. 9, pi. i. The margins of the snout form a right or a nearly right angle, its extremity being rounded ; the margin of the body between the snout and the extremity of the pectoral fin is undulated. Width of the interorbital space considerably exceeding that of the orbit and spiracle ; eye rather small, about as long as the spiracle. Distance between the nostrils a little more than their distance from the end of tlie snout. Teeth very slender, acutely pointed, widely set with narrow base. Outer pectoral angle nearly a right one. Sides of the trunk nearly smooth, but the greater part of the pectorals and the margin 1 Forhandl. Vidensk. Selsk, 1880, p. 105, and Nyt Mag. f. Naturvid., xviii., 1884, p. 119. = Collett, Nor.sk. Nordh. Exped. Fisk., p. 14. 2 Strom, Norsk. Vid. Selsk. Skrift., 1881, p. 79 ; Collett, Nyt Mag. /. Naturnd., xviii., 1884, p. 118. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. 0 of the head, also the snout and iutoroi-bital space, are studded with minute or very small spines resting upon a stellate base. A series of larger spines runs along the median line of the back and tail, commencing immediately behind the occiput. A group of three similar spines occupies each side of the shoulder ; a short series composed of three or four spines along the supraorbital margin and above the spiracle. The spines alono- the ridges of the snout are also somewhat enlarged. Greyish-brown above with a trace of a darker spot on each side of the body. Lower parts white, with large sub- symmetrical brown patches. In very young specimdfis the lower parts are uniform white. Habitat. — A large male specimen, 24| inches long, was obtained on the cruise of the "Knight Errant," at Station 9, on August 23 (1880), in 608 fathoms, together with three small ones, of which two are males 6i inches long, and one a female 8 inches long. A fourth very young male specimen was caught at Station 4 in about 400 fathoms. The Norwegian expedition obtained one male only, at 115 kils. west of the Norsk Islands, Spitzbergen, at the depth of 4.59 fathoms. Mr. Collett's description of this species is so detailed, that I need only refer to those points in which our specimens differ from his, or in which I can supplement his observations. The most important difference between the specimens obtained by the Norwegian and British expeditions is the number of scapular spines, which in the former is only two, whilst four of our five specimens show three placed in a triangle. In our old specimen the two dorsal fins are joined at the base, but a small spine intervenes between them in our young specimens. The young sjsecimens are more uniformly covered with those minute spinelets described in the adult fish, but the larger spines are much more acute and prominent, longer and claw-like. The number of the median series varies: in the adult there are 8-f-19, in the three young males G-f 10, 8 -f- 16, and 11+ 21 ; in the young female 7 + 17. This deep-sea species of Eay shows some striking peculiarities. The teeth are remarkably slender, small, irregularly and widely set, different from those of other British Eays. In young specimens, at any rate, those of the male do not differ from those of the female. The mucous membrane behind the upper jaw forms a pad with a lobulated surface. The mucous cavities of the head are extremely wide ; and finally, the accessory copulatory organs have a spongy appearance and are flexible, the cartilage by which they are supported being a simple slender rod. Fig. A represents the adult male three-sevenths of the natural size ; fig. B, a young of the natural size ; and fig. C is a separate view of the mouth of the adult specimen. (ZOOL. ClIALL. EXP. — PART LVH. — 1SS6,) T-11 2 to THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Raja plutonia. Raja plutonia, Garman, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoiil., vol. viii. No. 11, 1881, p. 236. " Disk, including ventrals, broader than long, subquadrangular, broadly rounded in front and on the lateral angles ; snout forming a very blunt angle ; margin opposite the o-ill-openings nearly straight. Tail about one and one-half times the length of the disk, slender, depressed, with a cutaneous fold on each side near the extremity. Eostral cartilage short, not extending to the end of the snout. Mouth moderate, slightly curved, width equalling the distance between the outer angles of the nostrils, and contained twice in its distance from the end of the snout. Teeth about thirty-two series (a young specimen). Eyes large, longitudinal diameter of orbit greater than their distance apart. Interorbital space concave, narrow ; width rather more than two and one-half times in the distance of the eyes from the end of the snout. Spiracles small. Anterior nasal valve tubular ; posterior reaching the mouth, free on its outer margin. Hinder extremity of pectoral broad, roundetl. Ventrals deeply notched, anterior portion narrow, extending farther from the middle of the pelvis than the posterior '■' Back and tail covered with small, closely set, stellate-based scales, which bear elongate, slender, compressed, backward directed points. Larger spines form a supra- orbital row, and a single one stands on each side of the back of the head. The largest on the body form a close vertebral series on back and tail. On each side of the shoulder girdle there is an irregular series of five, and a short distance in front of each of these stands one or a pair. On each side of the tail there are two series, little smaller thaik those of the medial row. Smooth below. Very small specimens have not so many spines. " Brown, grayish in small to purplish in the largest specimens at hand, with more or less irregular transverse series of distinctly defined spots of brown, often confluent into short bands, interspersed among which are spots of white of varying size and shapes. Tail with cross bands of light and of dark. Dorsals dark. Entire lower sui'face white." This species was obtained during the cruise of the U.S. steamer " Blake," in fi'om 229 to 333 fathoms, oft' the coast of Florida, in lat. 32° N., long. 78°. Another deep-sea Eay from the North American coast of the Atlantic has been noticed by Goode and Bean' under the name of Raja granulata in tlie following terms : " A remarkable species with the back and ventral surface covered with minute sharp granular ossifications. Of the same type as Raja lievis (?), and having 30-31 teeth on each side ; the back granulated and slate-coloured ; the ventrals distinguished by reticulate markings and the claspers slender and scarcely expanded." Obtained on the Le Have Bank. ' Bull. Essex Inst, vol. si., 1879, p. 28. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. 11 Raja hatis, L. Raja batis, Strom, Norsk. Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift., 1881, p. 80; 1884, p. 46. „ „ Collett, Nyt Mag. f. Naturvid., xviii., 1884, p. 119. The common skate, which is generally found near the coast in rather shallow water, has been observed on the Norwegian coast to descend to 150 fathoms. ■^o^ Rdja vomer, Fries. Raja vomer, Collett, Forliandl. Vidensk. Selsk. Christ., 1880, p. 106; Nyt Mag. f. Naturvid., . 1884, xviii., p. 119. „ Strom, loc. rit., 1881, p. 81; 1884, p. 46. 1> )» Inhabiting deeper water than the common skate, not rare at a depth of 70 fathoms, and descending to, or even beyond, 150 fathoms. Raja fullonica, L. Raja fullonica, CoUett, Forliandl. Vidensk. Selsk. Christ., 1880, p. 106; Nyt Mag. f. Naturvid., xviii. 1884, p. 119. Reported by Collett to occur locally on the Norwegian coasts at depths of from 80 to 250 fathoms. Raja nidrosiensis. Raja nidrosiensis, Collett, Forhandl. Vidensk. Selsk. Christ., 1882, No. 7, p. 2, c. tab. ; Nyt Mag. f. Naturvid., xviiL, 1884, p. 121. „ „ Strom, Norsk. Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift, 1881, p. 80; 1884, p. 47. Snout long and pointed ; the width of the interorbital space is contained about four times and one half in the length of the snout. Body above smooth, rough only on the snout and the upper margin of the eye, in some old specimens also along the front margin of the disk ; the body below thickly covered with minute asperities. No larger spines on the disk. The tail in the males with a median series (containing about forty spines), but none on the sides ; the old females with three series, the median series containing a varying number of spines, some of which are sometimes irregularly crowded together. Between the dorsals there are, as a rule, a few spines. The teeth form from forty-one to forty-four series in the upper, and from forty-one to forty-three in the lower jaw. Coloration dark greyish-brown above ; the mucous pores marked with black vermicular spots. Lower surface blackish, without spots. This species is locally not uncommon on the Norwegian coast, for instance in Throndhjem Fjord, at a depth of 150 to 200 fathoms. It is one of the larger skates, the specimens in the British Museum measuring from 38 to 46 inches in width. 12 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Urolophus, M. and H. Urolophus kaianus. Urolophus kaianus, Giinth., Report on tlie Shore Fishes, Zool. Chall. Exp., part. vi. p. 37. Habitat.— OS the Ki Lslauds, Station 192, September 26, 1874; lat. 5° 49' 15" S., long. 132° 14' 15" E.; depth, 140 fathoms; bottom, blue mud. HOLOCEPHALA. Chimcera, L. Chimcera monstrosa, L. During the cruise of the " Knight Errant " a young male was obtained at the depth of 555 fathoms (Station 4). The length of its trunk is 5 inches. The specimens caught by the " Triton " are still younger ; two, a male and a female, having the trunk 2\ and 3 inches long, came from a depth of 516 fathoms (Station 10). Finally, a male, which does not appear to have been long hatched, has the trunk only 1^ inches long ; it came '^ from 565 fathoms (Station 11). These specimens are of considerable interest, as they show the gradual development of certain organs. The youngest example has the caudal filament least developed, the length of the tail measured from the vent, being little more than 3 inches, or twice the length of the trunk. The tail is comparatively much longer in specimens of the next size, but as its extremity is broken off in both, the exact proportion cannot be ascertained. In the largest of these young specimens, with the trunk 4^ inches long, the tail measures not less than 17 inches. Of the fins only the first dorsal with its spine is developed. Of the anal only a portion has appeared as a low ridge, but there is no trace of the second dorsal or of the caudal. The development of the prehensile organ on the upper part of the snout, which is peculiar to the male sex in Chimoira, keeps pace with that of the claspers. This organ is visible in our youngest specimen, which evidently was hatched only a few days, as a narrow cartilage of whitish colour entirely covered by the skin, but visible through it. It has not made as great progress in the largest of the young specimens, and therefore does not seem to become detached from the head before the individual attains to sexual maturity. REPORT ON THE DEEP-SEA FISHES. 13 The claspers are visible from the earliest stage, and although only 2 mm. long, show a distinct bifurcation. The occurrence of these specimens shows that Chimcera is a deep-sea fish, and one which propagates its species in deep water. If the propagation of Chimasra really takes place in deep water only, this circumstance would account for the scarcity of young specimens in collections ; and also the ova, which have been described as Chimceroid, seem to be rather those of Callorhynchus than of Chimoera, and, so far as I know, there is no well authenticated egg of the latter in any collection. Chimcera affinis. Cliiriioera affijiis, Capello, Journ. Math. Phys. e. Xat. Lisb., iv. p. 314, pi. iii., 1868. „ „ Jordan, Rep. Comm. Fish, for 1884 (1885). „ plumhea, Gill, Bull. Phil. Soc. Washington, Decemher 22, 1877. ahhreviafa, Gill, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. vi. p. 254, 1884. Scarcely distinguished from Chimcera monstrosa. Has been found first on the coa,st of Portugal, and later on the North American side of the Atlantic, at depths varying from 200 to 1200 fathoms. ACANTHOPTERYGII. Family P e r c i d .e. Anthias, Cuv. Anthias megalepis. Anthias megalejns, Giinth., Report on the Shore Fishes, Zool. ('hall. Exp., part vi. p. 37, pi. xvi. fig. E. Habitat. — Off the Ki Islands, Station 192 ; depth, 140 fathoms. Centropristis, Cuv. Val. Centropristis pleurospilus. Centropristis pleurospilus, Giinth., Report on the Shore Fishes, Zool. Chall. Exp., jiart vi. p. 37, pi. xvi. fig. D. Habitat.— OS the Ki Islands, Station 192; depth, 140 fathoms. 14 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. Scomhrops, Schlegel. Scomhrops chilodipteroides, Blkr. This fish, which was originally described by Schlegel in the Fauna Japouica, seems to be scarce on the coast of Japan, as it is not distinguished by a vernacular name. The Challenger Expedition obtained one specimen only, 16 inches long, off Inosima, at a depth of 345 fathoms. Like other Japanese fish Scomhrops re- appears in the AVest Indies, Poey having described a closely allied species under the name of Latehrus ocidatiis} The reason why I hesitate in specifically identifying the Cuban with the Japanese fish is the circumstance that Poey figures the strong teeth of the jaws as distinctly barbed, although he singidarly enough does not allude to this peculiarity in the description. Difi'erences in the statements of the number of the scales are of much less weight in regard to these fishes, because the transverse series are rather irregularly arranged and do not correspond with the number of scales along the lateral line. Poey also found only ten pyloric appendages in his specimen. He states that the fish is rare and an inhabitant of great depths. Scomhrops shows some noteworthy peculiarities in the structure of its abdominal organs. The gall- bladder [g) is excessively prolonged, lying behind the lower intestine and extending to the end of the abdominal cavity. The stomach [st] is very short and small, but the pyloric appendages {p), of which there are eighteen, are very long and wide. Seven- teen of them are convoluted and form a large bundle, whilst the eighteenth {p>') is straight, accom- panying the anterior portion of the intestine. The intestine ({) makes only one entire convolution. The air-bladder is large, attached to the walls of the abdomen, with the ventral part of its outer tunic thickened and giving support to the miich developed glandular red bodies. 1 Jlem. Hist. Nat. Cuba, ii., 1858, p. 168, Tali. xiii. fig.s. 11, 12 ; Tab. xiv. fig. 2. Fig. 1. — Scomhrops chilodiptcrindcx. st, .stomach ; i, i, intestine ; p, pyloric ajipemlages ; p', pyloric appendage separated from the re.